As the US-led war in Iraq is coming to an end, reconstructing a democratic Iraq and giving power to the Iraqi people are the most urgent jobs at hand. One question surfacing, much to the embarrassment of the UN, is the role it will or, more precisely, will be allowed to play in post-war reconstruction.
While the US and UK have openly reassured that the UN will play a "vital role," ironically the task spelled out for the international organization thus far takes the form of passing resolutions to endorse reconstruction efforts spearheaded by the US and UK. Yesterday, US Secretary of State Colin Powell announced that his country will seek a series of UN resolutions endorsing a future Iraqi government, oil sales and humanitarian aid. Surely, everyone remembers how the US and UK had to withdraw from the UN Security Council a resolution on endorsement for the war against Iraq due to strong opposition.
One two-fold question for the UN is this: should the body of nations endorse reconstruction efforts made possible only because of a war it had never endorsed to begin with, and does that in anyway signify a belated endorsement for that war?
Another question is whether, besides the provision of humanitarian aid, the UN's primary function in world affairs is being reduced to a mere rubber stamp for major powers' foreign policies that is engraved with the words "legitimacy granted?"
If the UN doesn't want to settle for that role, is it capable of doing more? If not, it is obviously regressing to its immediate post-World War II era state. This may be an inevitable development for an international body which has to rely on the mercy of its members to finance its enormous expenses. This is especially the case when such aid comes predominantly from a handful of powers, and when some permanent members of the Security Council do not chip in enough to come even close to be in proportion with the power they hold.
The truth of the matter is things are pretty much entirely up to the US and the UK. Without their backing, it is no exaggeration to say that the UN has been stripped of an arm and leg. Yet the cruel reality is the two would probably be able to carry on with the reconstruction work in Iraq without the meaningful participation of the UN.
If the US and UK allow the UN to participate in a meaningful way, they may be able to mend the broken relationship with other powers, such as France, Germany, Russia and China.
On Tuesday, Chinese Foreign Minister Li Zhaoxing (
Irrespective of who takes the lead role, the most important thing is to place power in the hands of the Iraqi people.
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Taiwan is facing multiple economic challenges due to internal and external pressures. Internal challenges include energy transition, upgrading industries, a declining birthrate and an aging population. External challenges are technology competition between the US and China, international supply chain restructuring and global economic uncertainty. All of these issues complicate Taiwan’s economic situation. Taiwan’s reliance on fossil fuel imports not only threatens the stability of energy supply, but also goes against the global trend of carbon reduction. The government should continue to promote renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, as well as energy storage technology, to diversify energy supply. It