Diplomacy is often a theater of the absurd, except to its practitioners. A perfect example of this is the hearty congratulations and uncritical commentary following the rubberstamped approval by China's parliament of Wen Jiabao (
Such behavior smacks both of hypocrisy and cowardice when you consider that most of the same leaders refuse visits from Taiwan's democratically-elected leader, President Chen Shui-bian (
Statements by a Belgian government spokesman indicate that the decision to refuse his visa had the full backing of all EU members and the European Commission. Such unprincipled behavior contradicts a false impression that European governments support freedom, democracy and individual rights. Perhaps this should not be surprising since members of the European Commission are themselves not elected through democratic means.
Despite the hectoring by EU officials to encourage the free movement of goods and services or financial capital within Europe and elsewhere, they are unwilling to allow law-abiding people to travel freely. It is tragic and ironic fact that terrorists have been able to travel more easily than have democratically-elected politicians from Taiwan.
Refusal by EU foreign ministers of a visa for Chen involved explicit kowtowing to Beijing. It appears that the refusal to issue a visa would breach the "one China" policy of the EU. While there are deep divisions over some foreign policy issues, EU members present a united front in their dealings with China.
But their policy toward Taiwan is less clear. Last week the European Commission opened a trade office in Taipei after several years of negotiations. Yet this followed the opening of a similar office in another of the last remaining outposts of communism, Cuba. And its caudillo and long-serving unelected leader, Fidel Castro, visits Europe with few restrictions.
Beijing is notorious for bringing diplomatic pressures to bear in a relentless pursuit of the isolation of Taiwan. It is well known that China's participation and support for international conferences or organizations is conditional on rejecting the participations of Taiwan's leadership. However, the most blame should go to those spineless politicians and diplomats that collapse under those pressures.
Such shameful behavior is an insult to Taiwan's citizens who have taken so many risks to express their commitment to democracy and freedom. A peaceful transfer of power after five decades of single-party rule in May 2000 made Taiwan the first democracy in the history of ethnic Chinese societies.
And Chen has been an indefatigable supporter of freedom and democracy in Taiwan. He served on a team of defense attorneys for activists arrested in the "Kaohsiung Incident," that set the stage for an effective political opposition to the single-party control of the KMT and the end of 40 years of martial law.
As political leader of the first party dedicated to democracy in Taiwan, the DPP, Chen was a strong advocate of human rights. Since his election, he has negotiated in good faith with the unelected officials in Beijing to promote peace and political harmony, while steadfastly refusing to compromise Taiwan's admirable democratic achievements.
Unofficial rules require denying visas, even for private reasons, to the top five of Taiwan's political figures. As such the president, vice president, premier, foreign minister, and defense minister are not able to visit countries that supposedly share their belief in freedom and democracy.
Apparently, EU officials are willing to compromise on what should be their most cherished principles of freedom, democracy and human rights. An expression among the English has it that "the law is an ass." If this be so, much worse must be said of the supposed delicacies of diplomacy.
Christopher Lingle is professor of economics at Universidad Francisco Marroquin in Guatemala and global strategist for eConoLytics.com.
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
The pan-blue camp in the era after the rule of the two Chiangs — former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) — can be roughly divided into two main factions: the “true blue,” who insist on opposing communism to protect the Republic of China (ROC), and the “red-blue,” who completely reject the current government and would rather collude with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to control Taiwan. The families of the former group suffered brutally under the hands of communist thugs in China. They know the CPP well and harbor a deep hatred for it — the two
RSS