Challenges of adopting
I'm writing in response to your Quick Take piece about adoptions ("Adopters avoid challenges," March 4, page 3).
"Why doesn't he look like you?" "Why don't you have your own children?" "Aren't you afraid his birth parents will try to get money from you?" These are a few of the typical, and tactless, questions that I hear on a daily basis from strangers that I come in contact with on public transportation or on the streets in Taipei.
Why do I share this with you? Because I want to let you know some of the challenges that every adoptive parent faces.
Your article stated that most people who adopt in Taiwan don't want to adopt a physically or mentally challenged child. Therefore, as the title states, they are avoiding all the challenges of adoption.
Family privacy is something you no longer have as a prospective adoptive parent. Courts and social workers question you on every aspect of your personal life as well as how you plan to raise your child. This long and arduous process full of paperwork and interviews is one that causes most people to lose the will to keep going toward the moment when a new child is brought home.
Add to this the integration of a new person into the family, and quite possibly, as is the case with my family, the integration of a third culture.
My husband is of the Ami tribe, I am American and our son is Chinese. We are responsible for teaching our family not only in our own two cultures, values and traditions, but also in those of his birth culture. This responsibility, this challenge, lies solely on the parents' shoulders.
A final challenge that I would like to share, and which only adoptive families will ever experience, are the questions that an adopted child raises about his or her birth family. It is our responsibility as adopted parents to openly share with our son his birth story, as tragic as it may be, and answer his question, "Why did my birth parents not want me?" It is our job to convince him that our love for him is unconditional and never-ending.
We must help him, through his entire life, to believe and accept that "blood" doesn't make a difference when it comes to our love as a family. I think all would agree this is a challenge that few people are able to meet successfully. These are only a few of the challenges that adoptive parents and their children face.
Who says adopters avoid challenges? Last year, my husband and I adopted a boy from a orphanage in Taiwan. Our son, Longlong, is profoundly deaf, has various physical problems as well as being severely developmentally delayed. Yes, most people believe that adopting a physically or mentally challenged child is more "noble" but I am certain the challenges of adoption are the same, regardless of the health of the child.
I believe your article quoted information from an article in a Chinese-language newspaper that ran on March 4 that included an interview my family was involved in. The reason we chose to share our story with the public was not for honor, praise or words of admiration. We simply wanted to share our story of love and encourage others in Taiwan to consider adoption.
Whether the child is healthy or has special needs doesn't matter at all when we consider the fact that all children need parents who will love and care for them unconditionally.
Adoption is full of challenges that not everyone can accept; but those who are able to accept the challenges will have the most precious and worthwhile experiences of loving and growing in love with a child. A child that wasn't born of blood, but was born of chosen love.
Jeri Kay Long Kao
Taipei
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS