In response to the DPP's demand that its lawmakers relinquish their posts in media organizations, the heads of the Northern Taiwan Society, the Central Taiwan Society and the Southern Taiwan Society suggested that media reform should go beyond removing party, political and military influences from terrestrial TV stations. They also argued that all-round complementary measures should be drawn up.
It must be pointed out that the media play an important role in a democracy and should be society's public instruments, rather than being inappropriately manipulated by political or business forces. Due to historical factors, however, Taiwan's media have long been controlled by political forces and the shadow of such control remains. The call to free the media from political and military influences is timely.
President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) demanded that his party members take the lead in stepping out of the media. His request might be criticized within the party as draconian or be interpreted as pandering to the public.
However, with this action as a model, people and the groups advocating social reform can therefore demand that other political parties or politicians follow suit. The KMT should also completely retreat from media operation, instead of continuing to control the media under the pretext that it has placed party assets in trust.
More importantly, freeing the media from political and military influences is just a step, not the ultimate goal, in media reform. Taiwan's media have veered toward monopolization, commercialization and an ideology-oriented direction while at the same time they are covetously eyed by China's investors. Under such circumstances, only requiring the withdrawal of political forces and moving the media toward liberalization are insufficient in the process of reform.
The reform must be based on the ideal structure of mass communications in democratic politics. For the sake of the sustainable development of Taiwan's democracy, the media should become neither a propaganda tool for a handful of politicians nor money-making machines for conglomerates. Rather, the media should serve the public and meet the people's needs for information, culture and education.
To put it more concretely, important media resources,?such as radio bandwidths, should be defined in policy-making and legislation as public assets, not in the possession of individuals, political parties or the government. The ownership structure of the media (cable TV channels, radio stations and newspapers, among others) should be diversified, offering all groups opportunities to participate and make their voices heard. The media operation should also be professionalized.
The above-mentioned public communication system aims at realizing the values of democracy, openness and pluralism.
In the long term, media literacy education should be promoted and people should be provided with mechanisms to balance and criticize the media.The social groups and individuals concerned about Taiwan should identify with these values and help establish the system.
Lin Lih-yun is an assistant professor in the department of journalism and communication studies at Fu Jen Catholic University.
Translated by Jackie Lin
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —