There's more to pro-life view
I appreciate the arguments in Geoff Merrill's letter (Letters, Feb. 7, page 8), especially since they steer clear of the "blob of tissue" approach made laughable by scientific discovery regarding the complexity of life. To call "bizarre" the notion that abortion is akin to murder, however, demonstrates a lack of understanding of the pro-life position.
Pro-lifers believe in choice -- they believe that both parties, mother and baby, must be given that choice. When the choice must be made between one's convenience and another's right-to-live, that choice should clearly favor life.
For the sake of argument, many pro-lifers will grant cases of incest, rape, or life of the mother. These cases are miniscule in comparison to the hundreds of thousands of abortions performed yearly on women who are attempting to combat the natural results of a previously made poor choice, or who want to avoid the inconvenience of a baby at this point in their careers.
For this reason, pro-lifers seek to help women make right choices prior to getting pregnant by heavily emphasizing abstinence and contraceptive education. Incidentally, pro-lifers are also in the forefront of counseling women who are suffering the negative physical and mental effects of abortion.
Finally, pro-lifers would hold that an opinion poll is not a defining factor in determining whether a child should have a choice to live.
Merrill strays from a fair-minded discussion of the abortion issue when he concludes his letter by inferring that US President George W. Bush chooses not to focus on those who commit crimes in the name of pro-life. The FBI recently brought to justice one such criminal, and to include him in the pro-life camp does not fairly represent those who seek only to broaden the notion of "choice" to include the least protected.
Dan Long
Taipei
Teacher's face tells us little
I laughed myself silly reading that the Ministry of Education doesn't think Indians and Filipinos have "native" accents ("Ministry cool to teachers from India, Philippines," Jan. 21, page one). Why can't the government say what they mean: we want people with white faces and long noses to teach English. Those with darker color skin need not apply.
I am not sure this is so much a government policy as it is bowing to market pressures. I teach at a kindergarten. At the school I teach at, there was an ethnic Chinese from Singapore whose English was as good as mine, with no audible accent. But her face was Chinese, and the parents told the principal to get a white face or they would pull out their children. What a pity!
She was an early elementary teacher. I am not. I had three hours of training before being thrown to the "lions." I have fun, but someone else who has been trained in early childhood education would be a superior teacher for the sake of the children.
What really needs to happen is for someone to start an association dedicated to educating Taiwanese parents.
If the environment is not going to change, (and by that, I mean a ready access to English print and visual media on the street, nationwide) the best teachers for the children would be someone who can help them understand. Some Taiwanese English-language teachers I have met have a very adequate and sometimes superior command of English. Songs, stories, fake conversations are all good in their place. But if the parents don't speak English at home, the kids won't either. Some parents can't.
And that's OK. But the ones who can, limit their English to "What's this?," "What's that?" and "What's your name?" If this is the only English the kids hear outside of class, they won't speak whatever English they have learned in the classroom at home.
Just like affirmative action in the US came along to try to erase some of the prejudices in American minds and practices, some version of this needs to happen here. An auxiliary American to help with pronunciation would be a good thing, but only as an auxiliary. If the classroom English teacher is an American, he or she should at least be conversational in Mandarin.
The students, in kindergarten, elementary school, junior and high school should be taught to use their English in daily life. Part of their homework, as corny as it may sound, should be to watch English-language TV programs. One cannot learn English only in the classroom one hour a week, or a day. More time listening to English is needed. Even if one relies on the subtitles, the sound track would be in English and it would benefit the students to listen.
I sincerely hope that parents can be educated away from prejudices, and that the best teachers can be obtained for the children of Taiwan. Whether they are Chinese or American, or green men from Mars, they should be the teachers who can best help the children understand, and not just someone with a white face.
Shervin Marsh
Ilan County
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) said on Monday that it would be announcing its mayoral nominees for New Taipei City, Yilan County and Chiayi City on March 11, after which it would begin talks with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) to field joint opposition candidates. The KMT would likely support Deputy Taipei Mayor Lee Shu-chuan (李四川) as its candidate for New Taipei City. The TPP is fielding its chairman, Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), for New Taipei City mayor, after Huang had officially announced his candidacy in December last year. Speaking in a radio program, Huang was asked whether he would join Lee’s
RSS