The scandal-ridden, controversial independent councilor Chu An-hsiung (朱安雄), who has been described as a "black gold" politician, was elected speaker of Kaohsiung City Council, Wed-nesday, thanks to the all-out support of KMT and PFP councilors.
Ever since the DPP caucus in the city council decided to support Chu, it has been criticized from just about every direction. Some of its party members even burned their party IDs to protest and not a few lawmakers denounced the caucus' decision. Internal and external moral pressure forced the DPP's Central Standing Committee to withdraw the caucus' resolution and field its own candidate.
How many votes Chu could garner in this speakership election became an indicator to examine whether the governing DPP still holds on to its ideals. Although it was just a local race, I believe all DPP supporters closely observed whether the party, founded to oppose black gold, would shoot itself in the foot.
The election results showed that the DPP's nominee Kao Tzeng-ying (高宗英) got 14 votes, all from his party colleagues. To supporters' relief, the DPP has not lost its soul-searching ability after all.
But an analysis of Chu's votes shockingly revealed that the biggest contribution to Chu's victory came from KMT and PFP councilors, who claim to have cut ties with black gold or boast about their clean images.
The Kaohsiung City Council is composed of 14 DPP, 12 KMT, 7 PFP, 2 TSU and 9 independent seats. The poll results showed that all the DPP councilors voted for their candidate Kao. The two TSU councilors voted for the TSU's Yeh Chin-ling (葉津鈴).
But among the 12 KMT and 7 PFP councilors, only the KMT's Lee Fu-hsing (李復興) and the PFP's Wu Yi-cheng (吳益政) voted for themselves. This means that in the 25 votes the independent Chu received, the KMT and the PFP contributed 11 and 6 votes respectively, with the remaining 8 votes coming from other independents.
If the pan-blue camp, with 19 seats combined, could have cooperated for the speakership, they would have been only four seats short of winning. Even if the camp had been unable to attract more votes from outside, it might have been able to win the speakership and deputy speakership by a relative majority in the second round of voting. But the two opposition parties seemed to lack interest in taking the helm of the council and instead jointly supported an independent councilor.
The DPP caucus' decision to support Chu is worth discussing, but so is that made by the party to, in the end, meet the expectations of society.
This reminds me of former US president Richard Nixon's TV speech when he was questioned about bribe-taking. He ran for the US vice presidency on the same ticket with Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1952. As the election campaign turned white-hot, rumors were spread that Nixon had received US$18,000 in bribes. To clear his name, he defended his integrity on TV. What touched the audience the most was his words about his wife Pat. He said, "Pat doesn't have a mink coat. But she does have a respectable Republican cloth coat."
Although the DPP lost the mink coat of the council speakership and deputy speakership, it does have a respectable cloth coat woven of the threads of its core values of anti-corruption and opposing black gold.
Despite a secret ballot, the votes Chu received have laid bare the parties backing him, allowing people to recognize which party sides with black-gold politics. Since the KMT and the PFP, like Faust, did not hesitate to sell their souls, it is hoped that the media can use the same standards to examine these two parties as it does the DPP.
Chiu Li-li is a Tainan City councilor.
Translated by Jackie Lin
For the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), China’s “century of humiliation” is the gift that keeps on giving. Beijing returns again and again to the theme of Western imperialism, oppression and exploitation to keep stoking the embers of grievance and resentment against the West, and especially the US. However, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that in 1949 announced it had “stood up” soon made clear what that would mean for Chinese and the world — and it was not an agenda that would engender pride among ordinary Chinese, or peace of mind in the international community. At home, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) launched
With a new White House document in May — the “Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” — the administration of US President Donald Trump has firmly set its hyper-competitive line to tackle geoeconomic and geostrategic rivalry, followed by several reinforcing speeches by Trump and other Cabinet-level officials. By identifying China as a near-equal rival, the strategy resonates well with the bipartisan consensus on China in today’s severely divided US. In the face of China’s rapidly growing aggression, the move is long overdue, yet relevant for the maintenance of the international “status quo.” The strategy seems to herald a new
To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement. First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy. Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn. Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With