TSU lawmaker Su Ying-kuei (
At the same time, the KMT is intensifying its efforts to amend the relevant law, which prohibits a recall of a council speaker within one year of his or her election. While the KMT's desperation to catch its own fall is understandable, its efforts appear misdirected. It is questionable whether this amendment, in the long run would bring more good or more harm.
As much as the KMT may hope to undo its mistakes and as much as anyone may think the newly elected speaker Chu An-hsiung (
It would be entirely at odds with accepted legal practice to amend the law and then have it retro-actively apply to Chu as the KMT and the PFP are proposing. Moreover, legislative efforts targeting specific individuals are questionable -- if not downright unacceptable -- to begin with.
While it was both morally and politically stupid and just plain wrong to cast votes for the scandal-ridden Chu in the first place, once he has been elected he is privileged with certain rights, such as the right to not be recalled for the wrong reasons. It is like before his or her wedding, one is entirely at liberty to choose whomever one wants to marry, but once married, at least according to Taiwan's law, one can't simply end the marriage unless either the spouse agrees or the spouse has done something wrong, such as have an extra-marital affair.
Of course, had Chu engaged in vote-buying, then strong reasons would exist to recall him. In fact, if his election is deemed illegal to begin with, there may not even be a need to recall him. This is exactly why a speedy investigation and trial of the case is badly needed -- to prove that Chu indeed engaged in vote-buying.
It is disturbing to see the KMT threatening to decline approval of the government budget at the Legislative Yuan unless the DPP cooperates with the amendment efforts. No less inappropriate is the KMT's accusation that the DPP would be providing a safe harbor for "black gold" if it refused to support the amendment.
If KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
In November last year, a man struck a woman with a steel bar and killed her outside a hospital in China’s Fujian Province. Later, he justified his actions to the police by saying that he attacked her because she was small and alone, and he was venting his anger after a dispute with a colleague. To the casual observer, it could be seen as another case of an angry man gone mad for a moment, but on closer inspection, it reflects the sad side of a society long brutalized by violent political struggles triggered by crude Leninism and Maoism. Starting
The year 2020 will go down in history. Certainly, if for nothing else, it will be remembered as the year of the COVID-19 pandemic and the continuing impact it has had on the world. All nations have had to deal with it; none escaped. As a virus, COVID-19 has known no bounds. It has no agenda or ideology; it champions no cause. There is no way to bully it, gaslight it or bargain with it. Impervious to any hype, posturing, propaganda or commands, it ignores such and simply attacks. All nations, big or small, are on a level playing field
The US last week took action to remove most of the diplomatic red tape around US-Taiwan relations. While there have been adjustments in State Department “Guidelines on Relations with Taiwan” and other guidance before, no administration has ever so thoroughly dispensed with them. It is a step in the right direction. Of course, when there is a policy of formally recognizing one government (the People’s Republic of China or PRC) and not another (the Republic of China or ROC), officials from the top of government down need a systematic way of operationalizing the distinction. They cannot just make it up as
Like a thunderbolt out of the blue, with only 11 days remaining of US President Donald Trump’s term, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Saturday last week announced that the US Department of State had, effective immediately, lifted all “self-imposed” restrictions on how US diplomats and other government officials engage with their Taiwanese counterparts. Pompeo’s announcement immediately triggered a backlash. Criticisms leveled by former US National Security Council director for China, Taiwan and Mongolia affairs Evan Medeiros, who served in the administration of former US president Barack Obama, were representative of the disapproving reaction. “The administration is over in two weeks…