In any country, there is generally a right-wing faction and a left-wing faction. In most cases, the right is conservative and the left is in favor of reform. From this perspective, Taiwan's advocates of unification should be considered the right and advocates of independence the left.
Recently, however, in the course of discussions with Taiwan-ese friends, I have discovered that it is impossible to break down the situation in such simple terms. Dividing Taiwan's political spectrum into right and left, I fear, only confuses matters.
Why can't Taiwan achieve a breakthrough in its relations with Japan? No doubt the people of Taiwan have great difficulty understanding this problem. It relates to being unable to distinguish clearly between the right and the left.
Ever since the hardline anti-communist era of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), the Japanese politicians Taiwan has relied upon or considered friends have all been right-wing figures and the majority of those in Japan's right-wing faction are colored by nationalism.
Leaving aside the question of whether nationalism is good or bad, Japanese nationalism is unpopular both at home and abroad. It was used to send citizens onto the battlefields of World War II and, after Japan's defeat, it was never scrutinized as the driving force that led to the war. Instead, discussion became virtually taboo. Japanese are particularly averse to the word "patriotism."
But, on the other hand, hardline right-wing nationalists who are unhappy with this situation advocate the revival of militarism and nationalism.
The historical background of Taiwanese nationalism, however, is completely different.
Taiwanese nationalism under the name of the "localization" movement was used to bolster Taiwan's democratization, which began when Lee Teng-hui (
Differences between Taiwanese and Chinese (including a portion of the mainlanders in Taiwan) were emphasized and opposition to China was strengthened in order to sweep its influence out of Taiwanese politics.
At the same time, Japanese nationalism has always been inherently anti-communist and opposing China is one of its guiding principles. So Taiwanese nationalists in the Lee Teng-hui era were well-disposed to the nationalists of the Japanese right because of their common opposition to China. In other words, the affinity was based on the theory that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend." Tokyo Governor Shintaro Ishihara (石原慎太郎) and the comic book artist Yoshinori Kobayashi (小林善紀) are typical of Japanese politicians who became popular in Taiwan.
Even after the transfer of power in Taiwan, the government has continued to follow the foreign policy of the previous administration. This is one of the reasons why it has been unable to achieve a breakthrough in relations with Japan. Mainstream opinion in Japan is wary of nationalism and equally wary of those who are close to right-wing Japanese nationalists. This has obstructed the advancement of relations with Japan.
Taiwan's democratization is not entirely a matter of nationalism, however. There is another element to it -- that of left-wing reform. Democratization repre-sents demand for sweeping reform in Taiwan. If a different approach could be taken and contact made with Japan's reform faction, then, by giving the impression that Taiwan is undergoing reforms, it could perhaps make a breakthrough in future relations with Japan.
Takefumi Hayata is publisher of the Taiwan Report Weekly.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which