A journalist visiting the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia recently asked me why five out of six students he interviewed at King Saud University still believe that al-Qaeda was not responsible for the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon in the US last year? Dealing with this question is increasingly frustrating for me, because I have run out of plausible explanations.
I used to believe that denial of Saudi complicity in the attacks reflected our distress with what happened on that dark day. I hoped that we would have the courage to overcome our perceived humiliation and start looking deep into our national psyche, asking the big question, "Why did 15 of our young men attack America in so brutal a way?"
So far, we are no closer than we were after the attack to answering to this question, because we cannot even find the nerve to ask it. Had we been more confident and less full of bluster, we would have organized seminar after seminar to analyze what happened, to understand the reasons behind it, and to plan for a future without a similar tragedy. After all, Osama bin Laden's hijacked planes not only attacked New York and Washington, they also attacked Islam as a faith and the values of tolerance and coexistence that it preaches.
ILLUSTATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
But despite the enormity of what happened, we remain in denial. We still cling to conspiracy theories even after bin Laden and his fellow conspirators bragged about their great "achievement." We continue to close our eyes to the fact that 19 young Muslim men decided to leave home, head for what they described as jihad and became criminals.
It is past the time to move forward. We must admit that 15 Saudis helped perpetrate the attacks on the US of last Sept. 11, and that hundreds of other Saudis were needlessly killed far away from home, in the mountains and villages of Afghanistan.
We must uncover why Taliban-ruled Afghanistan seemed such an attractive destination for a significant portion of Saudi youth in the years before Sept. 11. Afghanistan was a country where Muslims were killing each other.
Any Muslim knew that his duty in this case was to try to reconcile the combatants, not join the violence.
When Arabs, including Saudis, first fought in Afghanistan in the mid-1980s, their campaign was politically and religiously just. Afghan Muslims were confronting foreign aggressors who sought to impose Soviet-style communism upon them.
The mujahidin were overseen by responsible clerics, who gave a shining example to Saudi youth. Some of those young men remained in Afghanistan as mujahidin and entered Kabul to take part in the bitter infighting that led to the Taliban's rise. Others returned home and were welcomed as heroes.
Were those young men who returned home then wiser than today's Saudi youth? What happened in the last ten years that allowed extremists to find so many eager followers? Since Sept. 11 we have busied ourselves counseling the Americans, pointing out where they went wrong, but no one is listening. Instead, we should be remedying our own deficiencies. We should be trying to answer the question that the Americans have been asking us incessantly: Why did young Saudi men take part in the attacks?
We must answer this question not for the Americans' sake, but for our own. It is not enough to say that the hijackers -- and, indeed, the many Saudis being held at Guantanamo Bay -- represent a subset of duped youngsters and that the rest of Saudi youth are different.
That is true, of course, but the damage that this relatively small group inflicted was monumental. It is far better to try and understand their motives.
In our attempts to defend and justify ourselves over the past year, we Saudis learned about the consequences of extremism at Waco, Texas and Oklahoma City. We wrote about the Michigan Militia and other American radical extremists. Of course there is extremism in America -- extremism as ugly as any that we have at home. But the Americans studied and analyzed minutely the Waco and Oklahoma City incidents on their own. The motives behind those attacks were examined in an effort to guarantee that such events would not recur.
We Saudis have failed to do the same. The most pressing issue now is to ensure that our children are never influenced by extremist ideas like those that misled 15 of our countrymen into hijacking four planes that fine September day, piloting them, and us, straight into the jaws of hell.
Jamal Khashoggi is deputy editor in chief of the Arab News, an English-language newspaper published in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
There are moments in history when America has turned its back on its principles and withdrawn from past commitments in service of higher goals. For example, US-Soviet Cold War competition compelled America to make a range of deals with unsavory and undemocratic figures across Latin America and Africa in service of geostrategic aims. The United States overlooked mass atrocities against the Bengali population in modern-day Bangladesh in the early 1970s in service of its tilt toward Pakistan, a relationship the Nixon administration deemed critical to its larger aims in developing relations with China. Then, of course, America switched diplomatic recognition
The international women’s soccer match between Taiwan and New Zealand at the Kaohsiung Nanzih Football Stadium, scheduled for Tuesday last week, was canceled at the last minute amid safety concerns over poor field conditions raised by the visiting team. The Football Ferns, as New Zealand’s women’s soccer team are known, had arrived in Taiwan one week earlier to prepare and soon raised their concerns. Efforts were made to improve the field, but the replacement patches of grass could not grow fast enough. The Football Ferns canceled the closed-door training match and then days later, the main event against Team Taiwan. The safety
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
RSS