The plan for cooperation between the KMT and the PFP in the Kaohsiung mayoral election as devised by the two party chairmen, Lien Chan (
There was to have been an integration of the pan-blue ranks, carried out between the two parties. But in the end, the KMT's Huang Jun-ying (
The problem is that nobody in the two parties is willing to play the game. So how can the entire electorate of Kaohsiung be expected to play it? Even if it is just a matter of calling upon the "anti-green" KMT and PFP supporters to sacrifice one candidate and support another, the difficulty of the plan is greater than mere "integration." It is not a matter that the two party chairmen can mend easily.
There exists only one precedent for the pan-blue camp in this situation. That was in the 1998 election for the mayor of Taipei City. The New Party's Wang Chien-hsien (
So will we see the the same thing happen in Kaohsiung? In other words, among the three pan-blue candidates, is there anyone willing to lay down their own candidacy to promote another? Chang Po-ya publicly resigned from her post as a national policy advisor to make clear her determination to campaign to the bitter end. Obviously, she won't be backing down. As for Huang Jun-ying, with the full weight of the KMT behind him, he has been rising in the polls. Not even KMT Chairman Lien Chan would dare to sacrifice him for the sake of "integration." The only one left is Shih Ming-teh (
With no takers in sight, I fear that a sacrificial move is even more of a fairy tale than KMT-PFP integration.
Chin Heng-wei is editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then