Once again, Russia's war in Chechnya -- which has rumbled murderously on for a decade -- has blasted its way onto Mos-cow's streets. The horrific death toll in the theater confirms Rus-sia's struggle against Chechen rebels as a distinct and bloody front in the global war on terrorism. That war must be won. But the time has also come for Russia to change its policy. Chechnya should remain part of the Russian Federation. But, clearly, that strategic goal cannot be achieved by military means alone.
Time after time, Russian federal forces deliver devastating blows on Chechen insurgents. But the resistance is never crushed as was proved, not only by the hostage-taking of over 800 Muscovites last week, but by the numerous raids on Russian troops in and around Chechnya. It would be wrong to put the entire blame for Russia's inability to crush the rebellion on our military commanders, although their planning could be better.
Why not? Because the Che-chen rebellion began in politics and it can only end through a political understanding.
What should be done? The first step must be to separate peaceful Chechens from the rebels. Regrettably, Russia failed to do this at the insurrection's onset, primarily because the bandits resided in villages and towns, which meant that many civilian deaths ensued when Russian forces attacked the rebels head-on.
Today, Russian federal forces are trying to separate common people from the bandits by entrusting the powers of self-government and security in Chechen settlements to indigenous Chechens. But this method is not working and won't work if pursued along the current lines. Most peaceful Chechens have not fully turned their backs on the bandits, perhaps because the bandits hunt down those who collaborate with Russian auth-orities. Moreover, many Che-chens fear Russian officials more than the bandits.
This transfer of executive authority to local Chechen self-governments will continue to fail unless rebel commanders are induced to join the talks. These commanders are often clan leaders who have never stood for election and won't ever consider putting their authority up for a vote. These men alone have the ability to deliver peace, if not democracy. If maintaining their authority and local autonomy is the price that must be paid to end, or at least limit the slaugh-ter, Russia should agree.
A big worry here, however, is that some rebels want to negotiate so as to play for time to regroup and resupply themselves. The global war on terrorism has made it more difficult for them to secure financial and material support. Afghanistan is no longer a training and supply base; Saudi Arabia and Turkey now strictly control citizens who once helped Chechen separatists. Even Georgia now closely -- although not as closely as Russia would like -- restricts Chechen activity. The world must assist Russia in seeing to it that alternative supply routes for the rebels do not materialize.
A year ago, President Vladimir Putin offered negotiations between his representative and an envoy of Aslan Maskhadov, the rebel warlord who won internationally supervised elections as Chechen president in 1997. That initiative collapsed because the Chechens were ordered to surrender their weapons within 72 hours. But Putin intended them to have 72 hours to ponder the good that might come from negotiations if they surrendered their weapons, not an instant surrender.
That clumsy diplomacy should not stop talks from getting underway. But to start them, a ceasefire must is needed as the first step, to be swiftly followed by the Chechens publicly dissociating themselves from terrorist acts such as the Moscow slaugh-ter. Anything less would be utterly unacceptable to Russians traumatized by the body count of dead hostages in Moscow.
It must also be understood that negotiations cannot rule out Russian military operations against bandits who continue their attacks as the negotiations ensue. Thus part of the federal forces must remain in Chechnya during any peace talks, which will also serve to strengthen the hand of those Chechens who choose to negotiate and are prepared to ensure the security of their settlements.
But just because troops will remain in Chechnya during any peace talks does not mean that they should conduct the talks. This happened after the first Chechen campaign (1994 to1996), but the peace that ensued was merely an armed truce.
Instead, a representative of Putin must oversee everything in Chechnya -- economic development, military action, and efforts to alleviate the suffering of the Chechen population. This person should assume control of Defense Ministry units, Interior Ministry troops, FSB agencies and local administrations.
Chechnya could be granted the status of a special presidential area throughout any negotiations -- indeed, until Chechen authorities establish their ability to enforce the rule of law. A single command accountable directly to Putin would rule out uncoordinated actions, improve discipline, strengthen the res-ponsibility of those who are dealing with Chechnya and diminish the carelessness with civilian lives of some Russian commanders.
The world now sees and understands the mighty burden Russia has borne and is bearing, in Chechnya. It must also know that international solidarity in the war on terror must mean not only Russia supporting the US in Afghanistan, but America and the West backing Russia in its counter-terrorist struggle. The terrible death count in Moscow, much as Russians may want to seek revenge, must also help all Russians see that Chechnya is a political problem demanding a political, not a military, solution.
Yevgeny Primakov is a former prime minister of Russia.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic