According to a media survey, the economic recession, falling interest rates and other factors are heightening worries about poverty among a large portion of the country's workforce.
The 2001 Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics' (DGBAS) survey of family income and expenditure indicates that the average income of the wealthiest 20 percent of families increased to 6.39 times the average of the poorest 20 percent, up from a factor of 5.55 in the year 2000. Disparities in personal income between the top 10 percent and bottom 10 percent rose to 61.3, from 38.9 a year earlier. These increases suggest that the distribution of wealth is becoming polarized and that Taiwan is facing unprecedented poverty issues.
The first reason for this increasing gap is that low-income groups are not protected by a sound social security safety net. Changes in industrial infrastructure over the past year have resulted in the highest unemployment rate ever. Low-income households usually include mem-bers who are unemployed or working in low-wage industries, whose incomes are particularly likely to be affected by a slow economy.
The social welfare system remains an inadequate patchwork of welfare measures. Unemployment benefits, for example, are only available for six months, whereas the average time taken to find a job is nine months. With the exception of health insurance, no universal scheme of social insurance has been introduced. The unfair system of distribution of welfare resources, which favors the north over the south and public servants, military personnel and teachers over workers, farmers and fishermen, has not been improved.
The second cause is the unfairness of the tax system. Voter pressures lead politicians to make shortsighted decisions about the tax system. Combined with the influence of vested interests, this has produced a distorted system.
DGBAS statistics show that tax income has increased by an average of 2.54 percent per year over the last five years. In the same period, nominal economic growth has been 7.6 percent, three times the increase in tax income. One reason for this is that high-tech industries enjoy many tax advantages, including investment-related deductions and five-year tax exemptions.
Because of securities transactions tax exemptions, the government can exact almost no tax from the liberal compensation paid to shareholders and employees of high-tech industries. Since unlisted stocks are also exempt from this tax, many large capitalists turn their funds into assets by setting up investment companies, profiting hugely by avoiding inheritance and gift taxes. If taxation of teachers and military personnel is based on concerns about fairness, then what is the reason for continuing the preferential treatment of shareholders in the high-tech industries whose incomes are far greater?
When the Ministry of Finance realized that the non-performing loans issue represented a bottomless pit, the suspension of the business tax, which goes to the Financial Restructuring Fund, was extended from the original four years to 10 years. Doesn't extending the suspension of this tax delay the expansion?
If the government does not do its utmost to minimize preferential tax exemptions or investment-related tax deductions to these famed industries, and use this extra tax income generated to build a comprehensive social security system, we can predict that even if the government is willing to issue debt to finance growing welfare expenditure and thus become a hostage to the financial markets, the income gap will continue to grow and popular support for the government will fall further.
Tuan Yi-kang is a DPP legislator.
Translated by Grace Shaw and Perry Svensson
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
I came to Taiwan to pursue my degree thinking that Taiwanese are “friendly,” but I was welcomed by Taiwanese classmates laughing at my friend’s name, Maria (瑪莉亞). At the time, I could not understand why they were mocking the name of Jesus’ mother. Later, I learned that “Maria” had become a stereotype — a shorthand for Filipino migrant workers. That was because many Filipino women in Taiwan, especially those who became house helpers, happen to have that name. With the rapidly increasing number of foreigners coming to Taiwan to work or study, more Taiwanese are interacting, socializing and forming relationships with
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant