Why complicate Pinyin?
When I started studying Chinese 11 years ago, Taiwan did not use Hanyu Pinyin. Taiwan still does not use Hanyu.
Regardless of whatever system of romanization for Chinese characters Taiwan uses, foreign Sinologists and students of Chinese throughout the world will continue to use the international standard, namely, Hanyu Pinyin.
What, therefore, has the Taiwanese government achieved -- other than to increase its isolation in the world and to irritate foreign students of Chinese who must now have yet another system foisted upon them?
I doubt we will hear an answer to this one!
Warren Hamilton
United Kingdom
Don't bet on China's demise
I agree with Thomas Fergo's point that if the Chinese Communist Party would fall from power, this would change the whole situation -- and under these circumstances keeping the status quo would pose a promising strategy (Letters, Oct. 1, page 8).
But I have to ask: how likely is that?
Dear Fergo, I would not suggest you to challenge my article ("Procrastinating won't help Taiwan," Sept. 27, page 8) with "China Collapse" arguments, because it would be foolish to regard them as mainstream and personally they do not convince me.
Please let me help you challenge my article in a much smoother way: You could for example have argued that under the WTO, China's economy will become very dependent and linked to the economies of Europe and the US.
This would mean that imports of western products such as high-quality steel or high-tech supplements would become vital to China's economic growth and -- because of this interdependence -- China would lose its "Missiles Trump Card" against Taiwan. Under such circumstances, it is very unlikely that China would provoke an economic embargo from the US and/or Europe because of a showdown with Taiwan.
In this scenario, the bargaining power of Taiwan would increase, rather than decline.
In general, my article did not aim to advise the Taiwanese people to start negotiations aimed at unification or declaring independence.
I'm not in the position to give such advice and I'm totally aware that my article is open to being challenged. The main purpose of the article was to remind people that maintaining the status quo has its own risks and these risks need to be addressed.
In conclusion, please remember this: opinion-page articles are intended to start discussions -- and intellectual discussion are based on concepts, not on personal attacks.
Thomas Schneider
Taipei
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
RSS