How did the public respond to the shocking murder case where two teenage students killed a teacher eight years ago? People simply considered it a sensational piece of news. The case was recently solved with the help of modern technology, in a manner that made the case appealing, like a US mystery movie. Educational circles have made no comment on the case. But the father of one of the suspects attempted to commit suicide to atone for his son's crime.
Educators and academics are apparently numb to news of this kind. Similar cases, like students assaulting teachers or people torturing their parents, occur frequently. Since educational circles have failed to come up with any solutions, the general public has not expected them to. A shared viewpoint is that the general environment is bad and that no one has control over the environment. This reasoning holds that films, TV programs and even the Internet are rife with pornographic and violent content, beyond our control.
The elderly believe that teachers should be responsible for juvenile delinquency, but that principle only fitted the time when highly respected teachers were authorized to inflict corporal punishment. That system is outdated. Parents used to request teachers to discipline their kids, but now teachers might be sued if they physically punish stu-dents. But society's demands on children to behave have remained unchanged. Old methods have been eradicated, but where are the new ones? What would you propose to improve it, educational reformers?
Those advocating educational reforms trumpet only one principle -- allow children to develop freely. These romantic idealists regard children as angels. They put the blame on parents and teachers for over-controlling and demanding too much from children's academic performance if children are not well-behaved. But some children are born obstinate and overbearing. It is still effective to follow ancient wisdom and teach children in accordance with their aptitude. The reformers advocate replacing punishment with rehabilitative education, but they should formulate the methods for teachers to do it.
The primary task of education is to teach children how to be good people. It will never be easy to achieve this if the teachings of the saints and the virtuous, as well as the traditional doctrines of morals and ethics, are abandoned. Although it is an educator's res-ponsibility to accomplish this, unfortunately, educational circles have still not reached a consensus on character development education. All of them are too busy with the Diversified Enrollment Scheme (
To solve this, the Ministry of Education established the Life Education Committee in 2000. It's indeed a progressive thing to replace traditional moral education with life education. However, committee member Sun Hsiao-chih (孫效智) says the group has not even reached a consensus on the definition of life education. In terms of a concrete plan for promoting life education, it's in the distant future, and the ministry seems to be in no hurry. Since the matter is not under social pressure, it can be delayed endlessly -- just like aesthetic education -- while scholars at the committee fight each other.
In view of the social chaos caused by youngsters, we should brook no delay in the promotion of life education that teaches people to know, respect, experience and accept human life. The media should urge the educational and cultural authorities to face reality and come up with goals and concrete measures for life education soon. The measures should be added to school curriculums, as well as the curriculums of teacher education. It does not become a responsible educator to act like an ostrich.
Han Pao-teh is director of the Museum of World Religions.
Translated by Jackie Lin and Eddy Chang
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
An article published in the Dec. 12, 1949, edition of the Central Daily News (中央日報) bore a headline with the intimidating phrase: “You Cannot Escape.” The article was about the execution of seven “communist spies,” some say on the basis of forced confessions, at the end of the 713 Penghu Incident. Those were different times, born of political paranoia shortly after the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) relocated to Taiwan following defeat in China by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The phrase was a warning by the KMT regime to the local populace not to challenge its power or threaten national unity. The
Since taking office, President William Lai (賴清德) has been an active proponent of the Healthy Taiwan initiative. As a member of the Healthy Taiwan Promotion Committee, I have also contributed recommendations on various pharmaceutical policies. After the committee concluded its seventh meeting on Saturday last week, Lai announced that the government is considering a three-year suspension on the Drug Expenditure Target (DET) system’s routine drug price surveys, highlighting the need to further support drug supply resilience. While I am supportive of this policy direction, I must also stress the importance of maintaining our original objective of improving the quality of