Resolve needed
President Chen Shui-bian's (
There seems to be undue concern over how the US will feel about a declaration of independence by Taiwan when the US position is in fact clear and obvious: while the US does not favor such a declaration, it has been the moral imperative of the US throughout its history to staunchly defend any nation willing to fight for its own independence in the face of foreign aggression.
The people of Taiwan and their government need not get permission, they need only get resolve. A firm resolve is what Chen is seeking and without it any war would quickly be lost, or agonizingly drawn out into an unsettled dispute, a scenario which the US leadership would avoid at all costs.
The US has learned much from its past wars-by-proxy with China in Korea and Vietnam. Those wars taught US soldiers that they can't win a war that the people are unwilling to fight. If the Taiwan people truly want independence, they must be willing to pay the price in blood. If they are unwilling to die for their freedom, then, as history has taught us, the effort will fail, even if backed by the force of the US military.
With the words "pre-emptive strike" on the mouths and minds of the Chinese leadership, Taiwan would do well to rethink its long-term strategy.
The Chinese leadership would like nothing better than a clean slate, with the "Taiwan question" settled before the 2008 Olympics begin. Chen would therefore do well to perform exactly as he has in the past few days, by trying to garner worldwide support, boost morale and resolve within, and push Beijing to put action behind it's words, which it is completely unprepared to do at this time.
Wang Wei
Chengdu, China
Charismatic leader that he is, President Chen has indeed become the hero for pro-independence citizens and politicians by asserting that Taiwan and China are "one country on each side" of the Taiwan Strait. Although the Mainland Affairs Council later stressed that policy on China had not changed, the president's strong determination to strengthen Taiwan's sovereignty was clearly demonstrated in this controversial speech. It is a pity that many international media organizations misunderstood the president, interpreting his remark as a declaration of independence.
There were bound to be misinterpretations, however, because the president's remarks left too much to the imagination. Investors in Taiwan's stock market felt nervous and the TAIEX plummeted 5.77 percent. Many investors complained that the president's remarks had been unwise. Chen's support for a referendum on Taiwan's future will inevitably increase China's suspicion towards our country. More unrest and turbulence across the Taiwan Strait can be predicted if Chen continues to speak out publicly.
In my view, the president should choose his every word with great care. Now, moreover, with the nation in an economic downturn, is not the time to assert the urgency of passing referendum legislation. The president should pay more attention to the economic
situation at home, not Taiwan's political status in the international community. Without strong economic development in this island, any endeavor to secure Taiwan's independence is destined to go unsupported by the people.
Robert Yang
Tainan
Stand up, Taiwan
I read in your newspaper and in the US media about the recent comments of President Chin Shui-bian (
As we say in America, the squeaky wheel gets the grease. The Chinese and even their students stand up for their side. Most Taiwanese here, however, just worry about themselves and don't want to get involved.
Yes there are those like me, who, despite not being a citizen of Taiwan still stand up for it. But, how long will I wait for the guy I am fighting for to pick up a stick and help?
Stand up now, or kneel to your masters.
Keith J Fritzsch
Woodbridge, New Jersey
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed