Africa is a rich continent -- rich in biodiversity, rich in mineral resources, rich in precious stones. It is also rich in traditional knowledge, especially knowledge associated with indigenous and medicinal plants.
But Africa is also a poor continent. With roughly 13 percent of the world's population, it enjoys only 1 percent of the world's wealth. An estimated 50 percent of Africa's population lives in poverty and 40 percent suffer from malnutrition and hunger. Two-thirds of Africa's land is degraded and more than half of its population lives without safe drinking water. Malaria threatens many regions and HIV/AIDS has devastated the youth of many African nations, including Botswana, South Africa and Zimbabwe, where an estimated 25 percent of adults are afflicted with this deadly disease.
Stark disparities exist not only between Africa and the rest of the world, but between Africa and the rest of the developing world. What accounts for this? There are many political, socioeconomic and environmental factors. Centuries of foreign colonialism followed by decades of homegrown authoritarian governments. A chronic lack of transparency in economic transactions often accompanied by corruption. Unsustainable use of natural resources. Marginal participation in the global economy.
But another, less visible or dramatic factor, is also at work -- Africa's woeful shortcomings in science and technology. By almost any measure, African science and technology is in a dismal state -- in terms of the miniscule numbers and inadequate skills of its research and technical personnel; the poor and neglected quality of the infrastructure; the low level of instruction in primary and secondary schools; the miserly investments in universities and research institutes.
What should African nations do to advance their scientific and technological capabilities? I suggest a five-step program:
First, develop, sustain and utilize local capacities and leadership. Developing scientific and technical capacity is less difficult than sustaining it, and sustaining it is less difficult than utilizing it. Yet, the ultimate impact of science and technology depends on all three factors. So African nations must invest in scientific and technological education and training. Each nation must also develop strategies that offer scientists and technologists local employment opportunities. To assure such sustainability, a vibrant educational system and an enduring, yet flexible, job base are needed.
Second, mobilize the best and most relevant science and technology in Africa and elsewhere to address critical social and economic problems. The food, health and environmental issues faced by people in the least developed countries are of a different dimension (often of a different kind) to issues faced by people in rich countries. Such differences help to explain why science and technology initiatives in developed countries rarely target Africa's most critical problems. If Africa is to use science and technology to tackle its most pressing problems, it must develop its scientific and technical capacities. Otherwise, it will be forever beholden to "second-hand" science that likely will never quite fit the continent's circumstances.
Of course, African nations should not turn their backs on research from beyond their borders. Indeed, efforts should be made to strengthen poorly funded, yet relevant, programs within UN organizations, and African nations should continue to pursue cooperative projects with constituencies with special ties to the continent. For example, sub-Saharan African scientists should seek to tap distant yet potentially strong ties with expatriate scientists of African origin working in rich countries.
Third, build the case for supporting indigenous science and technology. This is a critical challenge for African scientists given competing demands on the continent's limited financial resources. African scientists not only have an obligation but a self-serving interest to convince governments of the value of science and the need to support such endeavors. Such efforts must include a willingness to engage the public in discussions on science-based issues, a desire to lobby the government for support, and, perhaps most importantly, a commitment to pursue research that focuses on critical social and economic problems -- that is, agendas that allow scientists to help their nations build stronger and more sustainable societies.
Fourth, share innovative and successful experiences in the development and application of science and technology. Africa's successful experiences in the application of science and technology for development are all too often drowned out by dismal news across the continent. Identification of genetic molecular markers for improved tea harvests in Kenya, ongoing efforts to examine alternative treatments for river blindness in Uganda, research on sickle-cell anemia in Ghana, and detailed assessments in Madagascar of the effectiveness of medicinal plants in treating diabetes are examples of science-based initiatives that deserve recognition within the larger scientific community and among the public.
Fifth, strengthen and build African centers of excellence. Despite the dismal condition of most scientific and technological institutions in Africa, pockets of strength exist.
To address its problems and avoid being marginalized even more, Africa must devise long-term strategies that enable it to sustain economic growth and compete in a world where development is increasingly dominated by scientific knowledge and technical skills. Science and technology cannot save Africa by themselves, but Africa without science and technology cannot be saved.
Mohamed H. A. Hassan is president of the African Academy of Sciences and executive director of the Third World Academy of Sciences, Trieste, Italy.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant