China threat overstated
From various news sources in Taiwan as well as the US over the last few days, it has become apparent that a major threat to the psychological security of Taiwanese comes not from the Chinese government, but from the militaries of the US and Taiwan. It would also seem that this psychological attack has been, as in the past, aided and abetted by the media in Taiwan.
This is not to say that China does not constitute a continuing threat to Taiwan. It does, and it will continue to be a clear and present danger for some time. This is also not to say that continuing improvements to Tai-wan's military structure are not needed. They are needed. What I take issue with is the over-statement of China's current and short-term future military capabilities vis-a-vis Taiwan.
The simple truth is that China does not, and will not, possess the capability to carry out a successful amphibious assault on the main island of Taiwan.
In order to stage a successful land assault, the attacker must have three factors in its favor, as laid out in Michael O'Hanlon's article "Why China Cannot Conquer Taiwan" (International Security, Fall 2000).
The first factor is clear air superiority, something that China does not enjoy. The second factor is the ability to land a large force at an unexpected point of attack. Once again, due to Taiwan's geography, China does not possess this advantage, as there is only a handful of suitable landing areas for troops on Taiwan. Lastly, the attacking force must be able to reinforce its position quickly and with overwhelming strength before the defenders can react.
It is generally estimated that Taiwan would be able to bring at least 100,000 troops to any given point of attack within 48 hours, whereas China would be hard-pressed to land 20,000 troops within the same time period. The numbers for China are even worse when one considers the kill rates that are typical of attacks on fixed defensive positions by artillery batteries, as anyone who has seen Saving Private Ryan knows.
Let us then turn to the much-vaunted Chinese ballistic missile force, which seems to be the focus of everyone's concern. The effect of these weapons, while scary, is just that: scary, nothing more. The majority of China's vast missile capability is in the form of SA-2's, which are slowly being replaced by SA-10's (also known as S-300's). These missiles have an accurate range of no more than 300m. They would therefore hit their targets no more than 10 percent of the time. Were they to be used to support a military invasion, the Chinese would expand their entire stock of missiles simply trying to incapacitate Taiwan's air force, and even then they would have only a 50-50 chance of success.
Whether intended to intimidate Taipei to the negotiating table, or to maintain the specter of self-defeating nuclear and chemical attacks, China's missile threat remains just that: a threat. It is something that should be taken into account, but not overblown by those attempting to profit from arms sales and increased military budgets.
The people of Taiwan deserve fair and accurate information from both officials and the media so that they may have the tools to view the cross-strait military situation from a rational perspective rather than the emotionally irrational perspective to which over-statements of Taiwan's vulnerability lead.
It is not only increased budgets that can lead to psychological security for Taiwan's people. Increased and balanced information might do the same. It would reinforce the will of the people of Taiwan to fight for their right of self-determination and not be hoodwinked by prophecies of an Armageddon that is by no means certain.
Michael Faass
Toronto, Canada
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
Small and medium enterprises make up the backbone of Taiwan’s economy, yet large corporations such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) play a crucial role in shaping its industrial structure, economic development and global standing. The company reported a record net profit of NT$374.68 billion (US$11.41 billion) for the fourth quarter last year, a 57 percent year-on-year increase, with revenue reaching NT$868.46 billion, a 39 percent increase. Taiwan’s GDP last year was about NT$24.62 trillion, according to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, meaning TSMC’s quarterly revenue alone accounted for about 3.5 percent of Taiwan’s GDP last year, with the company’s
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have