Like similar systems in other countries, Taiwan's National Health Insurance (NHI, 全民健保) program wastes a great deal of resources. But in terms of overall consumption of social resources, the program ranks at a medium-to-low level. Taiwan's health insurance problem is therefore definitely different from, for example, that of the US, which has already affected that country's overall economy and international competitiveness.
Next, the financial problems facing the NHI program are not the result of problems with government finances. Although some government agencies would have us believe otherwise, the program is not damaging the government's finances. On the contrary, the government has channeled private resources into the public health system by means of the insurance premium, thereby shirking its responsibility by stealth. Ironically, the placing of the financial burden onto the insurance program itself is one of the sources of the problem.
Another is the absence of a fair mechanism for sharing the cost of the program. As a result, none of the parties financially responsible for the program (employers and patients, who pay for it, and the medical profession and NHI management, which are responsible for minimizing costs) have a platform for rational negotiations. As a result, every re-allocation of financial responsibility has resulted in meaningless conflict.
To solve this problem, a tailor-made negotiation mechanism removed from political influences is necessary. That mechanism must first be capable of calculating the costs of the program objectively and within the ranges of quality of medical provision and levels of payment at the point of treatment that are acceptable to the public. Then it must be capable of producing specific guidelines for all the parties involved to share the financial burden, with hospitals and NHI management pledging specific cost-savings and quality of service. To avoid departmentalism, the negotiation mechanism should be cross-ministerial in nature.
The third source of the problem is mismanagement on the part of the NHI management. It has failed to show, with detailed, accurate and objective statistics, that everyone and every agency concerned has made their due contribution. The fact is that, ever since the program was launched about seven years ago, the excessive profits of the hospitals have been greatly reduced through intensive, long-term control by the NHI management. On the one hand, however, it is not easy to translate such savings into concrete figures. On the other hand, the NHI authorities have neither the patience nor the ability to engage in dialogue with the public. As a result, the people have come to believe that they are the only "victims" of the premium hikes.
To begin with, adjusting premium rates is part and parcel of the financial responsibility system defined by the National Health Insurance Law (全民健保法). The NHI authorities have failed to plug the drug pricing "black hole" either by exercising their powers or by creative use of market mechanisms. They are also unable to collect the huge debts owed by the local governments -- debts resulting from political wrangling. This is all highly unsatisfactory.
As it demands better health care, however, the public cannot just sit back and watch as the program's financial plight worsens. Today, the social function of the NHI program is beyond doubt. As a social insurance system, however, NHI is very much like the black tuna, a sea fish considered public property. Everyone wants a bite of the black tuna, but people have no immediate incentive to protect the fish. As a result, tragedy is inevitable.
Michael Chen is an associate professor at the department of social welfare, National Chung Cheng University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic