President Chen Shui-bian (
Chen's gesture yesterday was necessary. Even before Chen had taken over the chairman's seat, debate had begun to resurface concerning the so-called "Taiwan independence clause" that is a part of the DPP's platform, in which the goal of establishing a "Republic of Taiwan" is outlined. As the chairman of the DPP, Chen has vowed to faithfully follow the DPP's platform, which would include the controversial clause. But the clause is obviously at odds with Chen's duty as president under the ROC Constitution.
In fact, this concern was raised in 1999 before Chen was elected to the presidency. At the time, the DPP hoped to resolve the dilemma by adopting the "resolution regarding Taiwan's future" that recognizes Taiwan as a sovereign country called the ROC. Concerns over the independence clause also played a role in Chen's decision to stay out of party affairs immediately after taking office.
Since the "Taiwan independence clause" remains part of the DPP's platform, some argue that the "resolution regarding Taiwan's future" is just a mere statement lower in status than the party's official platform. This argument is not without some merit. The passage of a resolution requires approval by the party's national congress by a majority, while any amendment to the party's platform requires two-thirds of the vote. So debate surrounding the independence clause continues, despite a subsequent amendment to the party's constitution putting the resolution on the same level as the party's platform, and despite an explanation from former DPP chairman Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) that doing so means the resolution takes precedence over the independence clause.
But none of these efforts have ever successfully cleared doubts about the DPP and Chen. The opposition camp continues to criticize the president. In fact, in response to Chen's invitation to a party leadership summit, KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) again raised questions regarding the DPP's "Taiwan independence clause." Moreover, he said the clause was a big eyesore to Beijing as well and something that can't possibly be constructive to the cross-strait relationship.
On the other hand, neither the DPP nor Chen can afford to advocate the outright removal of the independence clause. While most people -- probably including a good majority of the so-called "independence fundamentalists" -- can accept the characterization that "Taiwan is already an independent sovereign country named the `ROC'," and are not in any hurry to declare the founding of the "Republic of Taiwan," removing a clause advocating a long-held dream is entirely a different matter. Chen and the DPP would wind up alienating a large part of the pan-green camp. With the 2004 presidential race just around the corner, that's the last thing they want to do. Nor can they forget that, just last week, former president Lee Teng-hui (
Unable to remove the "Taiwan independence clause," Chen chose to openly endorse the "resolution regarding Taiwan's status," so as to downplay the weight of the clause and struggle free of its restraints.
For Taipei, last year was a particularly dangerous period, with China stepping up coercive pressures on Taiwan amid signs of US President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline, which eventually led his Democratic Party to force him to abandon his re-election campaign. The political drift in the US bred uncertainty in Taiwan and elsewhere in the Indo-Pacific region about American strategic commitment and resolve. With America deeply involved in the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, the last thing Washington wanted was a Taiwan Strait contingency, which is why Biden invested in personal diplomacy with China’s dictator Xi Jinping (習近平). The return of
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
Looking at the state of China’s economy this year, many experts have said that weak domestic demand and insufficient internal consumption might be its Achilles’ heel, with the latter being related to culture and demographics. Since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took office in 2013, he has been combating extravagance and corruption as well as rectifying a bad atmosphere. China expert Stephen Roach said the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) regulatory crackdown has been targeting Chinese tycoons, such as Alibaba Group Holding Ltd founder Jack Ma (馬雲), and opposing what the CCP defines as “excessively extravagant lifestyles,” such as playing too
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
RSS