In an effort to clean up Taiwan's grass-roots financial system, the Ministry of Finance recently ordered two government banks to take over seven poorly performing farmers' credit cooperatives in southern Taiwan. However, these credit cooperatives will not be shut down. They will continue to trade as branch operations of the two state-owned banks, the Taiwan Cooperative Bank and the Land Bank of Taiwan.
Undoubtedly, the ministry's massive crackdown was justifiable; though it came somewhat late. The seven cooperatives had long been operating in the red, with non-performing loans making up to 60 percent of total lending. But the crackdown was seriously flawed and fell short of expectations for deeper reforms.
First, it was wrong to allow the ailing cooperatives to stay in business. These cooperatives were in trouble mainly because of a steadily withering agricultural sector, the primary market for them and numerous other such operators. This market can only be expected to shrink further, rather than expand, amid stronger competition from imports in the years ahead as a result of Taiwan's entry into the WTO.
With such poor market prospects, business for these cooperatives is unlikely to improve, much less undergo a vigorous turnaround any time soon, despite the change in management. They may even become liabilities to the two government banks ordered to take them over. Problems have already arisen for the 10 state banks that were instructed to assume management of 36 other credit institutions in a separate ministry-organized clampdown in August last year. It is reported that the overdue-loan ratio of some of these banks has increased as a result of taking over the many questionable debts and assets of the cooperatives.
As in the previous case, the seven cooperatives are to be turned over to the two government-designated banks only after the ministry has cleared all of their losses, estimated at more than NT$10 billion. The ministry will plug the financial gaps with funds to be made available from the newly created Financial Restructuring Fund (FRF). In the August takeover deals, more than NT$70 billion from the fund was spent to offset losses incurred by the 36 cooperatives.
Such deals raise two major questions. One is the question of fairness. When the ministry decided to use money from the FRF to subsidize the takeover of the troubled cooperatives and then transfer them to the government-owned banks, it was effectively creating wealth for the state sector at the expense of taxpayers.
Besides, the takeover deals run counter to the government's privatization policy. There is no point in the government expanding its banking operations at a time when Taiwan needs to downsize its state sector to allow better use of resources and to ensure fair competition in the marketplace.
Indeed, the ministry's use of the FRF to clean up bad debts, while refusing to allow unviable cooperatives to shut down, violates the primary purpose of the fund. When the fund was created last year, it was designed to raise money for the government to help dispose of bad loans and at the same time force the seriously ailing institutions out of the market for good. It would be more appropriate for the ministry to allow the cooperatives, or any other banking institutions which have no chance of being turned around and becoming profitable again, to be liquidated by the forces of the free market. The sale of the ailing institutions on the open market would also enable the FRF to claw back some of the funds taken from it to help expedite debt disposals.
It is important to get the money back if the ministry does not want to see the FRF run out of money so fast that its ability to fund future rescue operations is crippled. The FRF can legally raise only a maximum of NT$140 billion. After subsidizing the takeovers this time, the FRF will have used up more than half of its resources. Any attempt to lift the legal ceiling of the FRF would be politically unfeasible, unless the fund can be utilized in a more effective way, as originally stipulated.
Judging from the way the ministry dealt with the credit cooperatives in the two rounds of crackdowns, officials at the agency are still quite conservative and unwilling to take bold steps to force the consolidation of the banking industry even though many new laws and institutions, including the FRF, are in place to push for fundamental reforms, such as bank acquisitions and mergers, auctions of bad debts and the restructuring of hopelessly weak institutions.
Officials still seem to believe that banking institutions must not be allowed to fail, for fear it will cause runs on the banks, undermine market stability and place depositors' interests at risk. But the problem is that if the government continues to reject the possibility of closing banks, it will never find it easy to implement crucial structural reforms. And if depositors are always fully protected, they will not take much trouble over selecting their banks, eliminating a crucial means of weeding out the inefficient operators.
Tseng Kuo-ping is a freelance journalist based in Taipei.
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
The recent passing of Taiwanese actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known to many as “Big S,” due to influenza-induced pneumonia at just 48 years old is a devastating reminder that the flu is not just a seasonal nuisance — it is a serious and potentially fatal illness. Hsu, a beloved actress and cultural icon who shaped the memories of many growing up in Taiwan, should not have died from a preventable disease. Yet her death is part of a larger trend that Taiwan has ignored for too long — our collective underestimation of the flu and our low uptake of the
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic