Direct links between Taiwan and China continue to generate much debate. At a time when Taiwanese businesses are rushing to China one after another, Huang Tien-lin (黃天麟) -- a national policy advisor to the president -- wrote yesterday in this newspaper that "investment is not the only means of entering China," and that "the best way to develop the Chinese markets is not to establish factories there. Rather, the way to achieve business success is to create a stable foundation in Taiwan and then improve quality." I absolutely agree with him.
I still remember that when the Asian financial crisis broke out in 1997, South Korea received about US$58 billion from the IMF, the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank (ADB) -- which the South Koreans regarded as a national humiliation. Taiwan, meanwhile, escaped safely from the crisis.
Today, the overall non-performing loan (NPL) ratio of the banking industry in South Korea has already decreased from a two-digit figure to under 5 percent, while that of Taiwan has rapidly increased from 6 percent to 12 percent. The most crucial factors are, firstly, that Taiwan has not undertaken financial reforms similar to those of South Korea. Secondly, both Taiwan's industries and its capital are flowing out. Since the government has always pretended that everything is going well, it has failed to take steps to establish a "market-exit mechanism" (
If US$140 billion in capital had been invested here, it would have reduced the NPL ratio of our banking industry. It would also have reduced the cost to the government of solving the problems of the banking industry. The people of Taiwan should reflect deeply and calmly over the fundamental cause of our increased NPL ratio.
Twenty or 30 years ago, economically mighty Japan invested massively across the world. But the massive outflow of capital that this entailed eventually led to the bursting of its economic bubble. As a consequence, both the stock and the real estate markets collapsed and the NPL ratio of its banking industry jumped dramatically. Meanwhile, the Japanese government repeatedly delayed financial reforms. Finally, it ran out of ways to boost its inexorably declining economy. In view of the Japanese experience, Taiwan's government has finally decided to introduce financial reforms. To avoid repeating Japan's mistake, however, the government must take the issues of business migration and capital outflow very seriously.
Taiwan is a small island. Its survival depends solely on its economic development. Taiwan's businesses must not invest too hastily in China. Instead, they should sell their products to China, or simply import raw materials from China before exporting finished products back there. We must view the economic growth and decline on either side of the Taiwan Strait in the correct light. The government has to strive to improve the investment environment here and businesses must regard "keeping their roots in Taiwan" (
Hwang Dar-yeh is director of the Center for Banking and Finance Research at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
Despite the steady modernization of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the international community is skeptical of its warfare capabilities. Late last month, US think tank RAND Corp published two reports revealing the PLA’s two greatest hurdles: personnel challenges and structural difficulties. The first RAND report, by Jennie W. Wenger, titled Factors Shaping the Future of China’s Military, analyzes the PLA’s obstacles with recruitment, stating that China has long been committed to attracting young talent from top universities to augment the PLA’s modernization needs. However, the plan has two major constraints: demographic changes and the adaptability of the PLA’s military culture.