Direct links between Taiwan and China continue to generate much debate. At a time when Taiwanese businesses are rushing to China one after another, Huang Tien-lin (黃天麟) -- a national policy advisor to the president -- wrote yesterday in this newspaper that "investment is not the only means of entering China," and that "the best way to develop the Chinese markets is not to establish factories there. Rather, the way to achieve business success is to create a stable foundation in Taiwan and then improve quality." I absolutely agree with him.
I still remember that when the Asian financial crisis broke out in 1997, South Korea received about US$58 billion from the IMF, the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank (ADB) -- which the South Koreans regarded as a national humiliation. Taiwan, meanwhile, escaped safely from the crisis.
Today, the overall non-performing loan (NPL) ratio of the banking industry in South Korea has already decreased from a two-digit figure to under 5 percent, while that of Taiwan has rapidly increased from 6 percent to 12 percent. The most crucial factors are, firstly, that Taiwan has not undertaken financial reforms similar to those of South Korea. Secondly, both Taiwan's industries and its capital are flowing out. Since the government has always pretended that everything is going well, it has failed to take steps to establish a "market-exit mechanism" (
If US$140 billion in capital had been invested here, it would have reduced the NPL ratio of our banking industry. It would also have reduced the cost to the government of solving the problems of the banking industry. The people of Taiwan should reflect deeply and calmly over the fundamental cause of our increased NPL ratio.
Twenty or 30 years ago, economically mighty Japan invested massively across the world. But the massive outflow of capital that this entailed eventually led to the bursting of its economic bubble. As a consequence, both the stock and the real estate markets collapsed and the NPL ratio of its banking industry jumped dramatically. Meanwhile, the Japanese government repeatedly delayed financial reforms. Finally, it ran out of ways to boost its inexorably declining economy. In view of the Japanese experience, Taiwan's government has finally decided to introduce financial reforms. To avoid repeating Japan's mistake, however, the government must take the issues of business migration and capital outflow very seriously.
Taiwan is a small island. Its survival depends solely on its economic development. Taiwan's businesses must not invest too hastily in China. Instead, they should sell their products to China, or simply import raw materials from China before exporting finished products back there. We must view the economic growth and decline on either side of the Taiwan Strait in the correct light. The government has to strive to improve the investment environment here and businesses must regard "keeping their roots in Taiwan" (
Hwang Dar-yeh is director of the Center for Banking and Finance Research at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own