Every time the president visits one of Taiwan's diplomatic allies, opposition parties invariably grumble about "money diplomacy." It's as if they are afraid no one will believe they are protecting the taxpayers' money if they aren't accusing the government of going on a spending spree.
If Taipei has had to depend on money diplomacy to maintain relations with its current roster of 28 allies, it is highly unlikely that China could have enticed some of Taiwan's former allies away without spending any money. After all, Beijing has used money as a diplomatic tool far longer than Taipei has -- look at the 1860km-long Tanzania-Zambia Railway that it built between 1968 and 1976.
Opposition parties should know that Taiwan's diplomatic relations belong not just to the ruling party, but rather to the state and the entire people. Taiwan needs visibility on the world stage; it needs to maintain diplomatic relations with an adequate number of countries in order to maintain that visibility. The president therefore has to visiting allies and spend some money overseas.
Politicians who ridicule the nation's allies as "places where not even birds would lay eggs" should not only dismiss any dreams they might have of becoming president but should first apologize to those they have insulted. They are also completely missing the point with their penny-pinching and nit-picking and succeed only in making themselves appear ridiculous.
KMT Legislator Huang Chao-shun (
Minister of Foreign Affairs Eugene Chien (
Taiwan is moving toward greater transparency in its foreign policy and investment proposals. Opposition lawmakers need to do their homework more carefully, instead of launching inane and unfounded attacks aimed solely at grabbing headlines or political power. It seems as if they are trying to reduce the roster of allies even further, driving friendly nations into China's arms, since they appear willing to stop at nothing to attack the president's reputation and damage the diplomatic relations.
Once again the KMT and PFP have proven that they are the main obstacles to the nation's economic and diplomatic development -- even bigger obstacles than Beijing, with its constant effort to denigrate and intimidate Taiwan.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then