Opposition parties see President Chen Shui-bian (
Conflict, compromise and progress have been the consistent hallmarks of Chen's career and he has shown that he will do whatever it takes to accomplish his goals. As an attorney for dissidents under the KMT's authoritarian regime, Chen stood up to the government. He embodies the characteristics that make a good lawyer -- someone who treats a client's interests as their own and responds to demands with a flexible attitude and strategy. But Chen is nothing like his predecessor Lee Teng-hui (
Chen had hoped to serve as a president who could transcend party lines. But from the very beginning of his administration, the opposition has been determined to boycott his government's every move. His first attempt to heal political divisions -- a meeting with KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
PFP Chairman James Soong (
Chen's revival of the idea of holding a summit of party leaders is unrealistic. Since Chen, Lien and Soong may be rivals in the next presidential election -- even though the idea of Lien running is ludicrous to everyone but a small minority in the KMT -- any idea of inter-party cooperation is highly unlikely. Since neither the KMT or the PFP have anything to gain by attending such a summit, Chen's idea is dead in the water. But why is a summit even needed?
The DPP proposed establishing a national stability alliance last year, before the legislative elections. But since the "pan blue" camp held a legislative majority, they ignored the proposal. Now Chen has resurrected the idea, given that the "pan green" camp is very close to forming a stable legislative majority. This was proven during recent votes on several presidential appointments, when the "pan green" camp mustered a block of 113 votes. With a little bit of work, the idea of a national stability alliance could become a reality.
Taiwan's political arena has been chaotic for the past two years and this uncertainty has damaged efforts to revitalize the economy. The KMT had 50 years and still failed to endear itself to the people of Taiwan. The "pan blue" camp has hurt the country with its two years of childish behavior. So if the ruling party can organize a national stability alliance to facilitate smooth policy implementation with the aid of TSU members and some independents, it should do so. Some political stability would be a most welcome development.
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
On the eve of the 80th anniversary of Victory in Europe (VE) Day, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) made a statement that provoked unprecedented repudiations among the European diplomats in Taipei. Chu said during a KMT Central Standing Committee meeting that what President William Lai (賴清德) has been doing to the opposition is equivalent to what Adolf Hitler did in Nazi Germany, referencing ongoing investigations into the KMT’s alleged forgery of signatures used in recall petitions against Democratic Progressive Party legislators. In response, the German Institute Taipei posted a statement to express its “deep disappointment and concern”