Elections for township repre-sentatives and borough wardens were held recently amid much discussion about the need for such elections. The debate should have focused on the crucial issue of how to deepen and strengthen Taiwan's democracy.
For a long time now, we have been dividing society into a duality consisting of the state and the markets, or, to put it another way, the public and private spheres. The sphere that lies between the two, civil society, however, is rarely mentioned or subject to any practical planning. But if a democratic society is to continue to improve and consolidate, the construction of civil society is crucial.
This involves the creation of an arena in which free rein can be given to the public's enthusiasm for all manner of things, airing and developing those aspects of life that have been beyond the ambit of government and sowing the seeds of a vital and dynamic civil society.
The construction of civil society in Taiwan will fill the widening gap between an ever smaller national government and constantly growing international markets. The establishment of such a bottom-up relationship should provide the government with a cultural foundation and eliminate concerns surrounding the inadequacies of government decision-making, thus increasing the effectiveness of policy.
A study by Robert Putnam of Harvard University into regional government in Italy showed how the central government attempted to iron out inequalities between the north and south of the country by allocating additional funds to the poorer south, only to end up producing further inequalities. The study showed that the reason for the inequalities was a difference in social capital; historically accumulated civic traditions and trust between citizens in the north resulted in superior government. In other words, the question of whether public expenditure can be effective chiefly depends on the efficiency with which civil society is capable of using it.
Social unity can make up for public expenditure, while mutual understanding and guidance can promote rational social discourse without diminishing society's capacity for humane conduct.
Citizen-initiated work, guided by civil society, will not be restricted by the framework of the nation state, but will instead support and enrich international civil society, its networks and social movements. The opportunity for people to reach out to international society will provide an appropriate means of initiating international movements in which the participants are able to focus completely on the task at hand.
Taiwan is proud of its democratic political system and the government is calling for the economy to improve, while also hoping that Taiwan will not be swallowed up by the waves of globalization. The construction of a civil society as globalization takes hold will facilitate recognition of a collective awareness. A deeply rooted collectivity will become a driving force for sustainable local development, which will lead to a good living environment and the creation of local characteristics, thus enriching the effects of globalization.
The social capital of economically successful nations will be of the same standard as the material capital. The possibility of this coming to pass depends substantially on the creation of civil society.
With the elections for Taipei and Kaohsiung mayors to follow close on the heels of the local elections, I hope that Taiwan will be able to use these elections to tailor a suitable democratic system for itself. Let us not forget that turning civil society into an arena for competition will both deepen democracy and enhance the prospects of eliminating vested interests.
Lu Chia-feng is a student in the School of Pharmacy of National Taiwan University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
For Taipei, last year was a particularly dangerous period, with China stepping up coercive pressures on Taiwan amid signs of US President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline, which eventually led his Democratic Party to force him to abandon his re-election campaign. The political drift in the US bred uncertainty in Taiwan and elsewhere in the Indo-Pacific region about American strategic commitment and resolve. With America deeply involved in the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, the last thing Washington wanted was a Taiwan Strait contingency, which is why Biden invested in personal diplomacy with China’s dictator Xi Jinping (習近平). The return of
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
Looking at the state of China’s economy this year, many experts have said that weak domestic demand and insufficient internal consumption might be its Achilles’ heel, with the latter being related to culture and demographics. Since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took office in 2013, he has been combating extravagance and corruption as well as rectifying a bad atmosphere. China expert Stephen Roach said the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) regulatory crackdown has been targeting Chinese tycoons, such as Alibaba Group Holding Ltd founder Jack Ma (馬雲), and opposing what the CCP defines as “excessively extravagant lifestyles,” such as playing too
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use