As I argued in part one of this article, China's anointed future leader, Vice President Hu Jintao (
This is not an age of East versus West, Communism versus Capitalism, nor of the Third World against the First and Second Worlds. This is not an age of nationalism versus hegemony or an age of religious fundamentalism versus religious freedom. This is not an age of alliance-forming in a polarized, triangular or multi-polar world. Today's world has entered a new era in which the free people of free nations have joined together to fight terrorism and fascism, which oppose freedom and human rights.
Can Hu put behind him the limitations of President Jiang Zemin (江澤民) -- as President Bush has those of his predecessor Bill Clinton and Russian President Vladimir Putin has those of his predecessor Boris Yeltsin -- and become the Chinese leader of this new era? Can he lead China toward freedom and democracy by terminating authoritarian terror?
Some people confidently declare that he can't. They say that Hu will be unable to overcome the systemic limitations of China's communist system, or to extricate himself from Jiang's influence. But neither of these claims stands up to scrutiny.
First, China's system is capable of being overcome. The roots of communism are different from those of fascism. Human freedom was valued by Karl Marx and was one of his goals. This is not true of the values and goals of fascism, however. Many of the Chinese Communist Party members who helped establish the PRC came into the movement by joining the war against fascism to realize freedom and democracy in China. The Communist Party's rule by terror since it came to power has been a betrayal of Marx's ideals.
The former communist
countries of Eastern Europe have already ended authoritarian rule and become free countries. Now it is China's turn. China has to survive and develop in this new era and new world order. It must accept the common values of freedom and human rights and avoid sinking to the level of Bush's "axis of evil" that opposes freedom and human rights -- a path to oblivion.
One alternative is to create a new, free system, letting China obtain a new life of freedom. The other is to refuse to reform the old system, letting the country become the sacrificial victim of Jiang's old system. The choice will be Hu's.
Second, Jiang's hold on power must end. Age and official positions do not indicate the extent of one's influence. The crucial factor is whether or not one's thinking is in line with the current of the times.
Former British prime minister Winston Churchill made his famous "Iron Curtain" speech in the small US town of Fulton, Missouri on March 5, 1946 and thereby set in motion the history of the second half of the 20th century, in which freedom and democracy defeated the USSR's empire built on military domination.
KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Jiang is a relic of a bygone age, like Yeltsin, Clinton and Lien. They are all members of an old-timers club.
Ruan Ming is a visiting professor at Tamkang University and a former special assistant to the late Chinese Communist Party secretary-general Hu Yaobang (
Translated by Ethan Harkness
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic