China recently mounted a large-scale springtime diplomatic offensive. Jiang Zemin (江澤民), Li Peng (李鵬), Zhu Rongji (朱鎔基), Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) and Zeng Qinghong (曾慶紅) have all taken trips abroad. But with the exception of Hu's visit, during which he was courteously received in the US, China scored no major diplomatic successes. The US, Japan, and perhaps Germany could be considered "big countries," but none of the other countries visited had that distinction, and some were even "rogue states."
China's most important adversary among the big countries, the US, has adopted a relatively uncompromising attitude toward China ever since US President George W. Bush came into office, leaving his counterpart, Jiang, with no choice but to soften his posture to conceal his losses. So when the US welcomed Hu, and especially when he was allowed to enter the Pentagon and meet with the US military, Hu was quite excited.
Although China has recently conducted military exercises in the East China Sea, the Chinese authorities reportedly do not want the media to make a big deal of the exercises. Obviously, they don't want to create an impression of opposing the US just for the sake of opposing the US. Over the question of Taiwan's WHO entry, however, China's representative, Sha Zukang (沙祖康), provoked US representative Tommy Thompson, and the two men nearly exchanged blows. Clearly, China's enmity toward the US is instinctive and subconscious.
China also frequently plays the "Russia card" to counter the US. It also imports large volumes of Russian weapons as a thinly veiled way of buying support. But all such efforts have failed to prevent Russia and the US from growing closer. A major breakthrough has just been achieved in negotiations between Russia and the US to cut back on nuclear weapons. The two countries even want to cooperate over the creation of a missile defense system, causing China to feel left out. NATO and Russia have also reached a historic agreement to create the NATO-Russia Council, in which Russia will sit as an equal with NATO members.
NATO was established as a North American-European military alliance designed to defend its members from Russia. Now that it is increasingly taking the form of a military alliance with Russia, apart from dealing with terrorism and rogue states, naturally NATO will target China. Jiang has been trying to curry favor with Russia, but Russia has rejected its blandishments.
Also, a noteworthy change has taken place recently in China's relationship with Japan, a country which plays a pivotal role in both the global and Asian economies. This significant change occurred when Chinese police burst into Japan's consulate in Shenyang, China, seizing North Korean asylum seekers. Beijing is not only passive in its foreign relations, but is also notorious for trampling on human rights. Its action at the Japanese embassy not only infuriated the Japanese public, but also caused South Korean nationalistic sentiments to run high.
Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi hadn't initially intended to allow the event to affect Sino-Japanese relations, but under pressure from domestic media and other political forces, Japan adopted a tough line, calling for China's apology. Japan moreover immediately came out to announce its support for Taiwan's bid for observer status at the WHO. Trumpeting support for Taiwan is rare for Japan, which has always been fearful of offending China. This could be an indication that Japan's policy toward Taiwan and China could be about to change. It is apparent that whatever progress was made during Li and Zeng's April visit to Japan has dissipated.
The CCP has consistently been expert at using conflicts between Western countries to its own advantage, and especially adept at using economic interests to create divisions among them. After Beijing's accession to the WTO, however, because China must treat all countries equally, the effectiveness of this weapon will be reduced. In addition, other factors -- such as the fact that Western nations have become more integrated -- have left China feeling isolated, forcing Beijing to strengthen ties with rogue nations and peel away its "terrorist " mask.
Even Myanmar, which relies heavily on Beijing, has expressed a measure of goodwill toward its own democracy camp, releasing Aung San Suu Kyi, as well as a group of other dissidents. In addition, Cuba's warm reception of former US president Jimmy Carter also shows the urgency with which Cuba hopes to improve relations with the US. It appears that the CCP is running out of rogue friends. Not only is "superpower diplomacy" on its last legs, but it seems that the days of "rogue diplomacy" are numbered.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in New York.
Translated by Ethan Harkness and Scudder Smith
US President Donald Trump last week told reporters that he had signed about 12 letters to US trading partners, which were set to be sent out yesterday, levying unilateral tariff rates of up to 70 percent from Aug. 1. However, Trump did not say which countries the letters would be sent to, nor did he discuss the specific tariff rates, reports said. The news of the tariff letters came as Washington and Hanoi reached a trade deal earlier last week to cut tariffs on Vietnamese exports to the US to 20 percent from 46 percent, making it the first Asian country
On Monday, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) delivered a welcome speech at the ILA-ASIL Asia-Pacific Research Forum, addressing more than 50 international law experts from more than 20 countries. With an aim to refute the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) claim to be the successor to the 1945 Chinese government and its assertion that China acquired sovereignty over Taiwan, Lin articulated three key legal positions in his speech: First, the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Declaration were not legally binding instruments and thus had no legal effect for territorial disposition. All determinations must be based on the San Francisco Peace
As things heated up in the Middle East in early June, some in the Pentagon resisted American involvement in the Israel-Iran war because it would divert American attention and resources from the real challenge: China. This was exactly wrong. Rather, bombing Iran was the best thing that could have happened for America’s Asia policy. When it came to dealing with the Iranian nuclear program, “all options are on the table” had become an American mantra over the past two decades. But the more often US administration officials insisted that military force was in the cards, the less anyone believed it. After
During an impromptu Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) rally on Tuesday last week to protest what the party called the unfairness of the judicial system, a young TPP supporter said that if Taiwan goes to war, he would “surrender to the [Chinese] People’s Liberation Army [PLA] with unyielding determination.” The rally was held after former Taipei deputy mayor Pong Cheng-sheng’s (彭振聲) wife took her life prior to Pong’s appearance in court to testify in the Core Pacific corruption case involving former Taipei mayor and TPP chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). The TPP supporter said President William Lai (賴清德) was leading them to die on