The failure of senior government officials to attend legislative committee meetings has become a serious problem.
Senior officials skipped last Monday's meetings of the Judiciary, Organic Laws and Statutes, Home and Nations, and Finance Committees. On the legislative floor, only deputies were in attendance, not their bosses. One is bound to ask why government officials are so afraid of setting foot in the legislature and whether this trend threatens our constitutional democracy.
The legislative committees have no powers of investigation, nor can they compel members of the general public to attend committee meetings -- if invited. It is worth discussing, however, whether civil servants have the right to decline such an invitation.
In democracies, administrative officials cannot shirk their obligation to attend the legislature to be questioned. Contempt of parliament is a criminal offence in many countries -- to prevent government officials from committing perjury or evading investigation in parliament. In its early days, the US Congress itself meted out punishment to offenders. Only in 1857 did the US enact provisions stating penalties in the law.
When National Security Bureau members were questioned recently by members of the Organic Laws and Statutes Committee, they stonewalled their inquisitors with responses such as "I'm not sure" or "I have no idea." It is deplorable that intelligence agencies, on the pretext of "national security" try to avoid accountability to the legislature.
I would urge that we amend the Law Governing the Exercise of Power by the Legislative Yuan (立法院職權行使法) by adding a regulation stipulating that anyone under legislative questioning who deliberately makes false statements about the facts as they know them at the time, should be listed in the legislature's communique and referred to the Cabinet for punishment.
Can the legislature truly hold the government accountable if it cannot establish a system to prevent officials' absences and their scornful attitude toward law-makers' right of interpellation?
We must make it a priority to criminalize the offense of contempt of the legislature and incorporate it into the Criminal Code. Article 168 of the US Congress Law, should be incorporated into the Criminal Code to establish penalties for this contempt. Only with effective criminal punishment can we prevent these incidents from occurring time and again.
The executive branch's scorn for the Legislative Yuan has crippled our constitutional system. The Cabinet's disrespect for the legislature's supervisory power has created an administrative dictatorship. Government departments' defiance of the legislature and their fear of explaining policies amount to dereliction of duty. If this situation continues, lawmakers' crucial right of interpellation, enshrined in the Constitution, will exist in name only.
In the interests of mutual respect between the executive and legislative branches, the opposition and ruling parties should establish the issues on which the government's leading officials must be present for questioning. Otherwise, the situation will continue in which only deputies or other officials deemed relevant are dispatched for interpellation. Legislators must produce a set of systematic measures to define "serious interpellation." In this way, they will guarantee the ability of lawmakers to exercise their right of interpellation.
Quite simply, there will be grave clashes if government departments do not improve their conduct. Apart from holding back budgets for certain agencies, the legislature might also boycott meetings in retaliation. The cost to society will be substantial. Government departments should think again.
Su Yin-kuei is a TSU legislator.
Translated by Jackie Lin
The EU’s biggest banks have spent years quietly creating a new way to pay that could finally allow customers to ditch their Visa Inc and Mastercard Inc cards — the latest sign that the region is looking to dislodge two of the most valuable financial firms on the planet. Wero, as the project is known, is now rolling out across much of western Europe. Backed by 16 major banks and payment processors including BNP Paribas SA, Deutsche Bank AG and Worldline SA, the platform would eventually allow a German customer to instantly settle up with, say, a hotel in France
On August 6, Ukraine crossed its northeastern border and invaded the Russian region of Kursk. After spending more than two years seeking to oust Russian forces from its own territory, Kiev turned the tables on Moscow. Vladimir Putin seemed thrown off guard. In a televised meeting about the incursion, Putin came across as patently not in control of events. The reasons for the Ukrainian offensive remain unclear. It could be an attempt to wear away at the morale of both Russia’s military and its populace, and to boost morale in Ukraine; to undermine popular and elite confidence in Putin’s rule; to
A traffic accident in Taichung — a city bus on Sept. 22 hit two Tunghai University students on a pedestrian crossing, killing one and injuring the other — has once again brought up the issue of Taiwan being a “living hell for pedestrians” and large vehicle safety to public attention. A deadly traffic accident in Taichung on Dec. 27, 2022, when a city bus hit a foreign national, his Taiwanese wife and their one-year-old son in a stroller on a pedestrian crossing, killing the wife and son, had shocked the public, leading to discussions and traffic law amendments. However, just after the
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully