The US Congressional Taiwan Caucus is apparently upset with the George W. Bush administration's less than enthusiastic approach to Taiwan's WHO bid. What has particularly provoked their ire is that the State Department, having been ordered by Congress to come up with a plan for getting Taiwan into the WHO, has failed to do so. The reason appears to be -- according to the report released on Wednesday -- that the State Department thinks that China wields too much clout in the WHO's corridors of power for any pushing of Taiwan's case to be effective.
Can it be any coincidence that this lack of zeal from the State Department comes the week of Chinese Vice President Hu Jintao's (
It is worth remembering how little is known in the US about Hu. A LexisNexis search of US print media brings up 799 mentions of his name since 1986 when he was a party secretary in Guizhou Province. Lest anybody think that this seems like saturation coverage of Hu's career, let us add that 34 percent of these mentions have occurred only in the last four months and 44 percent in the last year. Previous mentions of Hu's name will chart a career move or his attendance at a conference, rarely a speech and nothing about the man himself. Seldom does a man come to great office, to wield great power, and be so little known to the outside world.
It is natural, therefor, for the Bush administration to proceed with caution. There is need to get to know Hu, to proceed beyond the mindless rhetoric that characterizes so much of China's official face to the world. The satisfaction of that need is not facilitated by taking action that will provoke the usual knee-jerk responses, especially given that Hu has to look tough abroad to remain the frontrunner back home.
Taiwan's WHO bid therefore looks, this year, like a casualty of Washington's need to know Hu better. But there is no point in Taiwan being too upset about this. After all, as Hu jets across the Pacific come details of the conference in Florida last month attended by Minister of National Defense Tang Yao-ming (
For this reason we do not look with alarm to what might come from a Bush-Hu meeting, despite the fact that Hu is expected to be hardline on the issue of Taiwan. Nor do we regret the US's sacrifice of the WHO cause for better relations with China's heir apparent. WHO entry means little more than the
shadow of a propaganda victory for Taiwan against China -- it would be stupid to regret this too much when the substance of US concern for Taiwan is plain to see.
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
Taiwan last week finally reached a trade agreement with the US, reducing tariffs on Taiwanese goods to 15 percent, without stacking them on existing levies, from the 20 percent rate announced by US President Donald Trump’s administration in August last year. Taiwan also became the first country to secure most-favored-nation treatment for semiconductor and related suppliers under Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act. In return, Taiwanese chipmakers, electronics manufacturing service providers and other technology companies would invest US$250 billion in the US, while the government would provide credit guarantees of up to US$250 billion to support Taiwanese firms