Ever since Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) became president, he has faced three difficult political problems. The first is that three parties have divided the political world among themselves. Next is the problem of policy integration between the party, the legislative caucus and the ruling team. And finally, there is the problem of keeping the Presidential Office, the Cabinet and the various ministries and commissions in step.
After last year's legislative elections, the DPP at least obtained the status of being the largest party in the legislature, and resistance to passing legislation has somewhat subsided. Moreover, even though members of the political elite have differing interpretations of the fact that the constitutional system still has a dual executive -- and even though the bureaucracy is still waiting to learn the true essence of neutrality -- with Yu Shyi-kun's appointment as premier and the gradual rise of former members of Chen's city government team to high-level positions, the chaotic state of executive departments could be improved significantly. Next comes the problem of how to tame the DPP, which was essentially the mission of its Extraordinary National Congress.
In recent years, the direction of DPP reforms has mainly been in the area of so-called "internalization." In other words, once the legitimacy brought by the election of public officials is confirmed, the next step becomes how to shake off the constraints imposed by traditional supporters. Specifically, this means how to arrange things so that the distribution of power within the legislative caucus is reflected in the central standing committee. This requires looking at whether the three legislative whips shall serve on the central standing committee, and whether legislators can moonlight as chiefs of party headquarters.
Though the DPP has had to handle its sudden transition to ruling-party status, the basic tone of party reforms will not experience any immediate changes. Reforms have already ceased to be simply a matter of generational transition. The question of whether to get rid of individualism in order to strengthen the systemization of the party's constitution is no longer relevant. Instead, what matters is how Chen controls the DPP.
As Chen swallows up the state apparatus, he can openly dangle administrative resources and personnel appointments in front of key figures, incorporating his "pets" onto his team. And as it's not possible for Chen to incorporate some of his own staff members, how can members of the other DPP factions hope to be brought into the fold? To Chen -- unless the DPP disintegrates -- these appointments will always either constitute an administrative stumbling block, or, to some extent, be an obstacle to his re-election.
It is especially difficult to guarantee that Chen's "new middle way" policies won't be used by potential challengers within the party as a basis to form alliances. Some might even interpret the "new middle way" as a violation of party discipline, and -- following the Chiu Chang (
Recently, the most demanding act in the DPP's reform program was ensuring that the president assumed the post of party chairman. Essentially, Chen nominated himself for the chairmanship, also setting in place his nomination for another term as president, taking him one step closer to handpicking a successor. In addition, in a crude imitation of the KMT, the establishment of three vice-chairmanships was proposed.
On the surface this seems to be a wish to divide responsibility for the party, the legislative caucus and government liaisons between the three chairmanships. However, if this action is not used to arrange for party elders to leave office, at most it merely constitutes appointing party whips for the purpose of maintaining control over the party. Does this mean that these positions will be used to groom presidential candidates? In sum, apart from certain city mayors and county commissioners, a good talking to is probably enough to convince the majority of dissenting voices within the party.
Chen cannot be completely blamed for his personal desire to let "the government lead the party." The emergence of alliances in the DPP has consistently lacked any sense of organization, being completely decided by miscellaneous alliances and an inter-factional terror balance. Internal party operations are formally regulated, but regulations lack lasting cohesive power -- not to mention a lack of stable leadership and righteous elders. After all, in a jungle where everyone is looking after number one, isn't it pragmatic to be the one who makes the first move? However, when party loyalty and discipline are narrowly interpreted as existing for the purpose of political control -- and those in power are opportunists -- party organizations merely become part of the personal election machine. Where is the party's founding spirit or camaraderie to be found? Apart from ethnic identity, what is the foundation of the party's election support?
Discussions on the street often neglect the fact that parties must see to it that their legislators conform with the party's principles, charter and stance, and forge a connection with the voters. Ambiguous positions not only create confusion over identity and instability in the party's policy direction, but create a situation where even the most basic requirements of democratic politics -- namely, being responsible to the voters -- will cease to be protected.
Of course we oppose the KMT's past practice of "no separation between party and government," but "the party leading the government" isn't necessarily wrong. If party politics is the only means by which to pursue democratic politics, we shouldn't allow this means to be weakened. Otherwise, other social forces (such as big business) are bound to take advantage of the situation and assume policy-making authority.
Shih Cheng-feng is an associate professor of public administration at Tamkang University.
Translated by Scudder Smith
The EU’s biggest banks have spent years quietly creating a new way to pay that could finally allow customers to ditch their Visa Inc and Mastercard Inc cards — the latest sign that the region is looking to dislodge two of the most valuable financial firms on the planet. Wero, as the project is known, is now rolling out across much of western Europe. Backed by 16 major banks and payment processors including BNP Paribas SA, Deutsche Bank AG and Worldline SA, the platform would eventually allow a German customer to instantly settle up with, say, a hotel in France
On August 6, Ukraine crossed its northeastern border and invaded the Russian region of Kursk. After spending more than two years seeking to oust Russian forces from its own territory, Kiev turned the tables on Moscow. Vladimir Putin seemed thrown off guard. In a televised meeting about the incursion, Putin came across as patently not in control of events. The reasons for the Ukrainian offensive remain unclear. It could be an attempt to wear away at the morale of both Russia’s military and its populace, and to boost morale in Ukraine; to undermine popular and elite confidence in Putin’s rule; to
A traffic accident in Taichung — a city bus on Sept. 22 hit two Tunghai University students on a pedestrian crossing, killing one and injuring the other — has once again brought up the issue of Taiwan being a “living hell for pedestrians” and large vehicle safety to public attention. A deadly traffic accident in Taichung on Dec. 27, 2022, when a city bus hit a foreign national, his Taiwanese wife and their one-year-old son in a stroller on a pedestrian crossing, killing the wife and son, had shocked the public, leading to discussions and traffic law amendments. However, just after the
The international community was shocked when Israel was accused of launching an attack on Lebanon by rigging pagers to explode. Most media reports in Taiwan focused on whether the pagers were produced locally, arousing public concern. However, Taiwanese should also look at the matter from a security and national defense perspective. Lebanon has eschewed technology, partly because of concerns that countries would penetrate its telecommunications networks to steal confidential information or launch cyberattacks. It has largely abandoned smartphones and modern telecommunications systems, replacing them with older and relatively basic communications equipment. However, the incident shows that using older technology alone cannot