Ever since he took office, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) has not only made tremendous efforts to establish frank communication with his US counterpart, but has also been able to convince the US State Department that he is a pragmatic leader who would not recklessly pursue de jure independence.
The improvement in unofficial ties between the US and Taiwan, as evidenced by last year's deal on substantial arms sales to Taipei, the improved treatment of Taiwan's leaders making transit stops in the US and the cooperation between the two sides in the US-led war against terror, reflect a solid friendship as well as the pursuit of common interests. Most importantly, the relatively balanced approach that US President George W. Bush has adopted on cross-strait relations, in comparison with his predecessor, has also played a pivotal role.
Some have characterized the Bush administration's policy toward Taiwan and China as "strategic ambiguity with clear tactics." They mean that the US still upholds its "one China" policy and calls for the two sides of the Taiwan Strait to solve their dispute by peaceful means. In order to maintain a balanced approach toward Taipei and Beijing, however, Washington has gradually informed both Taiwan and China of its bottom line.
Bush reiterated that bottom line last month when he empha-sized the need for the US to adhere to the Taiwan Relations Act and to preserve its commitment to the people of Taiwan. He also reminded the two sides of the Strait not to provoke each other. The safeguarding of Tai-wan's democracy is the primary concern of the Bush administration, for which Taipei's ability to defend itself in the face of Bei-jing's military intimidation is also of the utmost importance.
China's growing military capability and the threat to Taiwan posed by its missiles are obviously of tremendous concern to Washington. Providing Taiwan with the weapons it needs to defend itself is therefore in line with Washington's strategic thinking in Asia.
Increasing exchanges between the militaries of the US and Tai-wan are one way for the two sides to deepen their acquaintance with each other. Minister of Defense Tang Yao-ming (湯曜明) is on a historic mission in the US, attending a private but highly political meeting. The US has rebuffed China's objections to the visit, saying it is consistent with US policy.
Tang's visit is a milestone in US-Taiwan relations. The significance of the State Department's decision to give him the green light lies largely in the fact that this represents a change in US policy toward Taiwan. His visit is the first official one by a Minister of National Defense since the switch in diplomatic recognition in 1979. The Florida conference is also the first high-level meeting attended by high-level security officials from both countries.
The government has a duty to explore every possibility to increase links between Taiwan and the rest of the world. Taiwan's strategic position vis a vis security considerations deserves more international attention than it gets, especially after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the US.
The US has redirected its foreign policy by strengthening its relations with its allies. This is a chance for Taiwan to become part of the US-led, global anti-terrorist campaign. Doing so would not only enable Taiwan to join the security alliance in the Asia-Pacific region but would also consolidate Taiwan's partnership with Washington.
Taiwan must seize the opportunity to bolster its position. For those who worry that Taipei's further tilt toward the US might irritate Beijing and undermine cross-strait stability, perhaps it's time to reject such old-fashioned thinking.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has