In an experiment in which respondents from different areas were asked to estimate the diameter of a coin, the intuitive estimates from respondents in slum areas were significantly larger than those made by respondents in wealthy areas. We might choose to interpret this as a result of psychological projection or of the personal circumstances of individuals. In either case, however, it reflects the complexity of issues concerning human beings. Simi-larly, the computerized lottery that was launched Jan. 17 provides a glimpse into the human condition.
People's explanations of events can be roughly divided into two types, theories of predisposition and theories of circumstance. Gamblers, for example, often feel that it is external circumstance rather than any lack of self-restraint on their part that leads to excessive behavior. Then, once the behavior becomes compulsive, they believe that their repeated inability to resist temptation comes from abiding characteristics inherent in their persons. In fact, specialists disagree about whether compulsive behavior is ultimately brought about by predisposition or is involuntary.
According to theories of predisposition, there are three primary components of excessively indulgent behavior: cravings or an urge to behave obsessively, a loss of control and a persistence with the behavior in question despite deleterious consequences.
This kind of gambling-control theory often highlights bizarre cycles arising in an individual's control systems. The more an individual gambles, the greater the chance he will lose control. And the more an individual experiences a loss of control, the more he throws himself into behavior surrounding gambling. The problem is that to attribute gambling exclusively to individual addiction and to evade public responsibility by labeling the problem as a psychological disorder is to oversimplify the matter.
As far as theories of circumstance are concerned, research shows that there are often serious consequences when gambling venues become more easily accessible or new lottery outlets open. Individuals may, for example, increase the frequency of their gambling as it becomes more convenient to do so, or they may simply spend more money on gambling. It is also possible that those who do not gamble will begin to develop the habit and that reformed gamblers will fall off the wagon.
For these reasons, with lottery fever continuing to rage, a recent proposal by some lottery vendors to open 24-hour ticket kiosks is cause for concern.
If we consider the interactions between individuals and their circumstances, there may be a number of reasons why lottery players believe that with a ticket in hand, their potential is infinite.
First, they overestimate the probability of winning. The media's incessant sensationalization of the winners creates a feeling of euphoria and acts as a catalyst to create an illusory sense of control.
Second, they may believe that by buying tickets from outlets that have sold winning tickets in the past, some of the fortune will rub off on them, or they may even believe good luck flows from person to person and will eventually come to them.
Third, they may believe that by continuing to gamble, they can increase their chances of winning and recover the costs.
Fourth, society creates a collective myth. Before the winning numbers are revealed, there is the sense that everyone has a chance. The media's sensationalizing of the countdown to the draw stimu-lates buying.
Due to the multiple obscuring effects and a lack of clear reference points, individuals constantly magnify their biased fantasies of winning a large prize.
Fifth, in lives that have become somewhat unpredictable, gamblers stake all hope on one last chance of redemption. Gradually, they form a dependent relationship with the lottery.
We could say that lottery fever is a naive form of optimism, a belief that good fortune will one day come knocking. Or we could say that it is cynical pessimism, a belief that life is hard and short and that one should enjoy life in the here and now.
Both responses reflect widespread feelings of uncertainty and risk in our daily lives. Under these circumstances, can it be that there are no other options apart from gambling with fate or throwing restraint to the wind?
Gambling is not merely a moral issue in which the focus is on whether individuals should gamble or not. It is a social issue as well. The gambling industry and its consumers come at a price -- in broken lives and public debts. The costs of our folly will be paid for by generations to come.
The recent wave of lottery fever can't be dismissed as a fait accompli because the government doesn't know who buys tickets and hence cannot take remedial action. This is an issue of inter-generational justice. When we put our money down to buy a hope, we are also rolling the dice on our futures.
Lin Yao-sheng is an assistant professor in the department of psychology at Kaohsiung Medical University.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
The recent passing of Taiwanese actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known to many as “Big S,” due to influenza-induced pneumonia at just 48 years old is a devastating reminder that the flu is not just a seasonal nuisance — it is a serious and potentially fatal illness. Hsu, a beloved actress and cultural icon who shaped the memories of many growing up in Taiwan, should not have died from a preventable disease. Yet her death is part of a larger trend that Taiwan has ignored for too long — our collective underestimation of the flu and our low uptake of the
For Taipei, last year was a particularly dangerous period, with China stepping up coercive pressures on Taiwan amid signs of US President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline, which eventually led his Democratic Party to force him to abandon his re-election campaign. The political drift in the US bred uncertainty in Taiwan and elsewhere in the Indo-Pacific region about American strategic commitment and resolve. With America deeply involved in the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, the last thing Washington wanted was a Taiwan Strait contingency, which is why Biden invested in personal diplomacy with China’s dictator Xi Jinping (習近平). The return of
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
Actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known affectionately as “Big S,” recently passed away from pneumonia caused by the flu. The Mandarin word for the flu — which translates to “epidemic cold” in English — is misleading. Although the flu tends to spread rapidly and shares similar symptoms with the common cold, its name easily leads people to underestimate its dangers and delay seeking medical treatment. The flu is an acute viral respiratory illness, and there are vaccines to prevent its spread and strengthen immunity. This being the case, the Mandarin word for “influenza” used in Taiwan should be renamed from the misleading
RSS