Taoyuan, Hsinchu and Miaoli are experiencing a glaring shortage of water. Although the government decided to handle the problem by making emergency appropriations of water intended for agricultural use, the threat of a water shortage is still very serious. Water policy could very well be the first challenge for the new Cabinet and the new century. A strategy should be devised as quickly as possible to counter the problem.
The variance in the periods of wet and dry seasons is growing, displaying greater and greater uncertainty. Thus the management of water resources must be considered a vitally important national policy. In the management of water usage as well as the response to droughts and floods, Taiwan must have a basic, long-term strategy characterized by foresight and overall understanding. Problems should not be handled on a case-by-case basis after they have already arisen.
Taiwan's mountainous geography makes it difficult to conserve water resources. We should do our utmost to protect mountain forests, streams and wetlands, letting water naturally seep down to replenish water resources both above and below ground.
But the irony is that on Tai-wan proper, as well as on the nation's offshore islands, streams have been incessantly dredged for years. Waterways have been straightened by truncating the curves and even riverbeds that are the nesting grounds for a variety of wildlife have been lined with cement. The result is that runoff from rainstorms reaches the ocean even more quickly. How can Taiwan do anything but resign itself to fate with such a contradictory concept of water management?
Mayors and county commissioners frequently put on a great show of fighting for water soon after taking office, but I haven't seen anyone take the initiative to establish laws for conserving, protecting, or actively developing water resources. Along the same lines, if the government's administrative apparatus is unable to proactively mobilize people and integrate resources, and if politicians merely hurl accusations back and forth after each disaster, then the water shortage problem will only become more severe.
Since the Hsinchu Science-based Industrial Park is so important, it can't go without either water or electricity. This is basic common sense. Can it be that the authorities responsible for managing the park have no emergency response mechanism in place?
Since 1996 the park has suffered three periods of water shortages. Why has our response been such that we still don't have a comprehensive response strategy in place?
Careful consideration should certainly be given to adjusting the orientation of the industrial park, based on new developments in the cross-strait relationship and WTO membership. The government must take precautions before it is too late, devising a complete strategy to provide the crucially important industrial park with water resources and creating guidelines for manufacturers to conserve water. Otherwise, no matter how much rain falls or how many reservoirs are built, sooner or later water supplies will not be able to keep up with the ever increasing demand.
Household and agricultural water use in surrounding areas must also be considered together with the future development of the industrial park. Having entered the WTO, Taiwan's agricultural development will undoubtedly need to be adjusted. The government should seize this critical moment to outline a new vision for water resources, industry and the people's livelihood on this "green silicon island."
Chiau Wen-yan heads the legal and policy studies group at the Center for Water Resources Studies at National Sun Yat-sen University.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
For Taipei, last year was a particularly dangerous period, with China stepping up coercive pressures on Taiwan amid signs of US President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline, which eventually led his Democratic Party to force him to abandon his re-election campaign. The political drift in the US bred uncertainty in Taiwan and elsewhere in the Indo-Pacific region about American strategic commitment and resolve. With America deeply involved in the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, the last thing Washington wanted was a Taiwan Strait contingency, which is why Biden invested in personal diplomacy with China’s dictator Xi Jinping (習近平). The return of
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
Looking at the state of China’s economy this year, many experts have said that weak domestic demand and insufficient internal consumption might be its Achilles’ heel, with the latter being related to culture and demographics. Since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took office in 2013, he has been combating extravagance and corruption as well as rectifying a bad atmosphere. China expert Stephen Roach said the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) regulatory crackdown has been targeting Chinese tycoons, such as Alibaba Group Holding Ltd founder Jack Ma (馬雲), and opposing what the CCP defines as “excessively extravagant lifestyles,” such as playing too