What will a former US president do for US$153,000? Sing and dance like a monkey? Juggle? In the case of Bill Clinton, it is something a lot less entertaining -- selling out his integrity, supposing, or course, he had any left. This is precisely what he did yesterday, when he said the cross-strait "reunification process" is "moving in the right direction" during a pro-unification rally in Sydney, Australia.
Many former US presidents give speeches and write memoirs to keep themselves busy and earn some quick bucks. There are also more praiseworthy examples such as former president Jimmy Carter, who devoted himself to the promotion of peace and freedom by mediating the Israel-Egypt dispute and serves as the chair of the Conflict Resolution Program. No one expected Clinton to live up to Carter's high standard, but now Clinton has simply gone too far.
The occasion on which Clinton chose to speak, a pro-unification rally hosted by a well-known radical unification group and a mouthpiece of Beijing, is inappropriate enough. His appearance there suggests support for cross-strait unification, which is not something he should be committing himself to.
Those still hoping that Clinton would keep his foot out of his mouth by uttering some mumbo jumbo about world peace and globalization, rather than directly indicating his support for unification, were disappointed. Clinton wanted his sponsor to feel that its money was well spent. What he said at the rally assumed that unification was not only a given, but also the right thing. His speech conveniently ignored the fact that the people of Taiwan reject unification and that they have a right to decide their own future.
Not that long ago, Clinton, as US president, said publicly that any decision regarding the future of Taiwan required the consent of Taiwan's people. Why is he now assuming and praising unification, when the people of Taiwan have turned their back on such a choice? By contradicting himself this way, Clinton compromised his integrity as a former US president.
The future of Taiwan, be it independence or unification, has to be decided by the people of Taiwan through the democratic process. By failing to respect this right to self-determination in his talk, Clinton insulted an important US value: respect for democracy. By publicly embracing the unification propaganda of China, a country notorious for human-rights violations, Clinton insulted another fundamental US value: advocacy of freedoms. One expects a lot more of former US presidents, though not, perhaps, this one.
Just one day before Clinton's speech in Australia, US President George W. Bush was concluding his trip to China. Contrary to Clinton's disappointing conduct, Bush's performance was commendable.
Refusing, despite pressure from Beijing, to forsake US' friend Taiwan, Bush is the only US president so far to repeatedly emphasize the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) in front of China's leadership and people on Chinese soil. He also did not mention the three Sino-US joint communiques during the trip, at least not in public. The only time he publicly conceded acceptance of the "one China" principle was on the last day of his trip in response to a question.
Most important of all was Bush's repeated emphasis on a peaceful resolution of the cross-strait issue. There is a world of difference between peaceful resolution and peaceful unification. The latter assumes unification is a given, while the former does not. The people of Taiwan have the right to decide their own future. That right must be respected. Bush apparently understands it, while Clinton does not. That makes the two men a world apart when it comes to integrity.
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
Before the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) can blockade, invade, and destroy the democracy on Taiwan, the CCP seeks to make the world an accomplice to Taiwan’s subjugation by harassing any government that confers any degree of marginal recognition, or defies the CCP’s “One China Principle” diktat that there is no free nation of Taiwan. For United States President Donald Trump’s upcoming May 14, 2026 visit to China, the CCP’s top wish has nothing to do with Trump’s ongoing dismantling of the CCP’s Axis of Evil. The CCP’s first demand is for Trump to cease US
RSS