After US President George W. Bush's press conference with Chinese President Jiang Zemin (
Clinton's mistake was to tell students at Shanghai University that the US "embraced" a "one China" policy 20 years ago. It was a mistake because, of course, it didn't. What it did do was to acknowledge that for China the "one China" position was its basic stance. It nowhere said that it agreed with that stance or would adopt it itself. Clinton swung US policy behind Beijing's view of cross-strait relations, partly because he thought that achieving some kind of rapprochement with China was just about the only thing his disastrous presidency -- at least as far as foreign policy went -- could achieve.
But that was then, and here we are with George W., a very different kind of president. Much was being made yesterday of the fact that Bush seemed to have a far more moderate tone than this time last year, when he approved the biggest arms sales to Taiwan since the end of his father's presidency in 1992. China's friends in US think tanks will no doubt spin the line that this reflects Bush's strengthening grasp on the realities of the cross-strait relationship -- which is really a coded way of saying that Bush is slowly realizing that respect for Taiwan, what it has achieved and what it stands for, cannot be allowed to get in the way of the "great power" relationship the US must naturally forge with China.
This is not an argument that impresses us. Bush started off his presidency with some strong words -- and actions -- designed to let China know there was a new administration to deal with that was not prepared to kowtow in the manner of its predecessor. He has no need to reiterate this. Having chosen the ground, Bush is now interested to see what China will bring to the picnic. Time will tell. The fact is that nothing can be achieved by the US president in cross-strait relations, except to deter Chinese aggression. He cannot make the people of Taiwan look with anything less than loathing at the Beijing regime, and he surely realizes that Beijing will not come up with anything new in Taiwan policy until the new post-16th Party Congress leadership feels comfortable in office.
Actually, Taiwan was not a major issue on Bush's agenda with China. Far more important was the subject of China's continued arms trade with rogue regimes, especially the help it has given Pakistan and Iran to build weapons of mass destruction. No deal was struck nor, officials said yesterday, would one even be drafted ahead of Bush's return to Washing-ton. Taiwan of course faces a threat from the 300 or so missiles based in Southeast China, which threaten its cities and military strongpoints. But the irony is that it is the weapons and weapons-building technology that China supplies to other nations that might be a bigger threat, at least if China were to offer a deal on proliferation in return for an agreement about arms sales to Taiwan. Not that we think the current US president would be tempted by such a deal. But it is certainly as well that the Taiwan Relations Act is a part of US law.
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
Small and medium enterprises make up the backbone of Taiwan’s economy, yet large corporations such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) play a crucial role in shaping its industrial structure, economic development and global standing. The company reported a record net profit of NT$374.68 billion (US$11.41 billion) for the fourth quarter last year, a 57 percent year-on-year increase, with revenue reaching NT$868.46 billion, a 39 percent increase. Taiwan’s GDP last year was about NT$24.62 trillion, according to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, meaning TSMC’s quarterly revenue alone accounted for about 3.5 percent of Taiwan’s GDP last year, with the company’s
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have