Taiwan's new national English exams, the General English Proficiency Tests, are halfway complete. Candidates can already take elementary, intermediate and high intermediate exams. These exams look good so far. The English is fine, and the tests are designed well.
The Language Testing and Training Center (LTTC) at National Taiwan University is finishing the final two tests: advanced and superior. This is where I begin to worry. The LTTC says that to pass the reading portion of the superior-level test, one must have a level of reading speed and understanding equal to that of a native speaker who has received higher education.
This is extremely difficult. To understand just how difficult it will be, think of Taiwan's abolished Joint College Entrance Examination. That English test was famous for being poorly written. A college professor in the US once commented, "It seems like a good high-school student wrote it." To put it another way, the writers of the English section of the joint examination would probably not be able to pass the new superior-level tests.
I fear that the LTTC, in attempting to create such a difficult test, will end up loading the tests with rare words and long, confusing sentences. That is what happened to Japan's English tests. Japan also has national English exams, known as the Eiken. In a disturbing coincidence, the Eiken tests also have five stages, which match the five levels of Taiwan's new exams. The worst Eiken tests are the final two, the ones matching Taiwan's uncompleted advanced and superior tests. Before Taiwan releases these two tests, I hope it studies Japan's Eiken to learn what not to do.
The Eiken tests are terrible for two reasons. First, they are full of difficult, rare, multi-syllable words that English-speakers seldom use. How can an English exam test with words English-speakers don't use? The students who memorize rare words and phrases are not masters of English.
Just like their counterparts in Japan, Taiwanese students memorize tons of difficult vocabulary without learning correct usage. Look at these example sentences from an actual textbook used in Taiwan: "They started an amphibian attack to annihilate enemies exhaustively" and "Those traitorous cliques are ambidextrous towards the king" are two such examples. Another example might even scare the reader: "My letter to mother must have miscarried, for she did not receive it." Obviously, this textbook's author has no problem memorizing difficult words, but doesn't know how to use them.
Rather than testing an ever-expanding slew of obscure vocabulary, tests should check the students' ability to use common words naturally. English speakers, for example, refer to the villain in movies as the "bad guy," but most people in Taiwan say the "bad man." Why memorize obscure vocabulary when it can always be checked in a dictionary anyway?
The second problem with Japan's Eiken is grammar. The Eiken attempts to check grammar by creating long, run-on sentences with a confusing mix of subjects, verbs and direct objects. The poor student then has to sift through the tortured sentence for the grammar mistakes.
My first reaction upon seeing the sentences on the Eiken was that the test's creators had no idea how to write a clear sentence. Sentences intended to test English ability had instead become perfect examples of terrible writing.
The English tests that the LTTC has released so far are well-designed and well-written. I hope the remaining tests are equally good. That means they must avoid the mistakes of Japan's system and focus on the students' ability to distinguish between correct and incorrect usage of common words and grammar. This skill is actually much more difficult, and much more useful.
Geoff Sant is a writer and linguist based in Taipei.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS