Chinese Vice Premier Qian Qichen (
Qian's remarks show that China's "united front" strategy against a DPP-ruled Taiwan has moved into a third phase.
In phase one, Beijing was unwilling to have contact with the DPP and adopted an attitude of "listen to his [President Chen Shui-bian (
But does Qian's speech really mark a shift in policy? It is too early to say. His remarks only prove that the Chinese government is making some technical adjustments to its Taiwan policy -- the fundamental "one China" principle remains unchanged. The "united front" strategy is also likely to remain unchanged -- except that more practical means may be adopted to achieve the goal.
It is also clear that Qian's speech set off a furor within the Chinese leadership, as indicated by reports that Jiang had raged against Qian's remarks and by the re-emergence of some hardline "one China"rhetoric. Zhang Mingqing (
Zhang also said that the invitation for DPP mem-bers to visit China did not include either Chen or Vice President Annette Lu (
The government's best response to Beijing's stratagem is just to listen and watch. Taiwan has repeatedly demonstrated its goodwill -- and willingness to hold talks without preconditions -- but it has yet to see any similar gestures from across the Strait. If there was any sincerity behind Qian's remarks, then Beijing will be willing to discuss the establishment of cross-strait economic-cooperation mechanisms as a way of establishing trust. The two sides could then gradually begin to negotiate, through channels such as the WTO or the Straits Exchange Foundation (
Less ideology, less politics and less controversy are needed in order to improve cross-strait relations -- as well as more contact, more goodwill and more economic and trade exchanges. It will take more than words in Beijing to close the gap between Taiwan and China. Only actions taken with good intentions can build a bridge of peace between the two sides.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then