Yu Shyi-kun will become premier next month, heading President Chen Shui-bian's (
This game of political musical chairs, however, does offer some clues as to the direction the new government will take. It is clear that Chen decided to reshuffle Cabinet portfolios with an eye toward the 2004 presidential election.
Firstly, outgoing Premier Chang Chun-hsiung (
Chang, who hails from the DPP's Welfare State faction and Executive Yuan secretary-general Chiou I-jen (邱義仁), from the New Tide faction, are both withdrawing from the political frontline. Meanwhile, Chen's own people and those from the Justice Alliance faction are taking up important portfolios. By bringing his own people into the Cabinet, Chen is taking full responsibility for the government and paving the way for a re-election campaign. Chen is clearly moving toward a presidential system, at least in spirit, even though the Constitution has yet to be amended to allow for such a system.
Secondly, the choices for the China policy and national security positions in Yu's Cabinet reflect Chen's emphasis on stability -- as well as his ambition to take control of the national security system, maintain stability across the Strait as well as a pro-US position and expand relations with other countries. Mainland Affairs Council Chairwoman Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) is retaining her position, while Chief of the General Staff Tang Yao-ming (湯曜明) is becoming defense minister. Deputy secretary-general to the president Eugene Chien (
Thirdly, despite Chen's slogans about working on the economy, Yu has been unable to convince an experienced KMT member -- such as Chiang Ping-kun (
Chen's third Cabinet reshuffle shows his confidence in rolling out an "A-bian government" -- not only does he feel he can ignore the opposition's arm-twisting, he can also avoid sharing power with other DPP factions . For better or worse, Chen is staking his re-election in 2004 on the creation of a system of shared responsibility with Yu.
Chen has said previously that "The day of election victory is the beginning of the re-election campaign." But the success of Chen's "rule by campaign" model depends on whether the new Cabinet can work its way through the political and economic predicaments that have befuddled his government and Taiwan for so long.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which