During his annual "state of the world" address last Thursday, Pope John Paul's remark on cross-strait relations came as a surprise, hinting at possible developments in the triangular relationship between the Vatican, China and Taiwan. For the first time, the Holy See referred to Taiwan and China respectively as the "Republic China (ROC)," and the "People's Republic of China (PRC)" while expressing his pleasure at seeing the two co-exist in the WTO.
It was only two months ago in October when the Pope openly apologized to China for past "errors" committed by the Catholic Church's missions in China and pleaded for the re-establishment of diplomatic ties. At the time, the Pope's statement created speculation that the Vatican may be forsaking its diplomatic ties with Taiwan. This was because Beijing had responded to the Pope's statement with a predictable and arrogant demand -- the Vatican must drop formal recognition of Taiwan.
However, the Pope's statement on Thursday could easily be interpreted as conceding the existence of "one Taiwan, one China," "two Chinas," or, at the very least, "two equally sovereign political entities" respectively ruled by the "ROC" and the "PRC." That is the interpretation the Taiwan government is adopting. The vice chairman of Taiwan's Mainland Affairs Council, Chen Ming-tung (
Also significant is the Pope's emphasis on the co-existence of China and Taiwan in the WTO, which may be an indication that the Pope thinks the WTO model is to be encouraged.
While it is too early to conclude that this interpretation of the Pope's speech is accurate, that kind of talk is certainly the last thing China wants to hear. For a regime that has consistently demanded recognition of the "one China" principle under which Taiwan is a mere province of China and the Taiwan government a mere provincial government, such talk is tantamount to blasphemy.
Is the Pope being unintentionally insensitive to the feelings of Beijing at a time when the Vatican is supposedly trying to re-establish diplomatic ties? Or perhaps the Vatican's attitude has changed since the Pope's open apology in October. While it is too early to tell, it should not surprise anyone should the latter scenario be the case. After all, too many issues between the Vatican and Beijing remain deadlocked, such as what to do with the Catholic Patriotic Church in China, a church established by the Communist Party of China, and whether the Vatican should give up its right to appoint bishops to China.
On an even more fundamental level, one issue will forever remain a sore spot between the Vatican and Beijing, that is, the latter's religious persecution. Besides China's usual crackdowns on members of the Falun Gong and members of the underground church in China who continue to recognize the Pope, the Chinese government has recently arrested Hong Kong resident Li Guanqiang (
Should the Vatican decide to establish diplomatic ties with Beijing -- a government that treats bibles, at least versions that it disapproves of, as contraband and those who believe in the bible as "cult members" -- how will it face its followers?
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS