Don't abuse `human rights'
Kenny Liu's complaints about Brian Kennedy's pieces, the US and human rights (Letters, Dec. 22, page 8) display the same shallow understanding of human rights that Kennedy has written about so often and so effectively in these pages.
Liu argues that wartime atrocities, rapes and even vandalism by a Taipei American School student are "violations of human rights."
The fact is that US troops are not ordered by their commanders to rape girls in Okinawa. Rape is a crime and a violation of the victim's rights, but it is not a human rights violation on par with a lack of jury trials, a lack of rights for the accused, the lower legal status of women and other systemic problems in Taiwan. That is a whole different order of problem. US officials were correct in those cases to complain of the Japanese legal system's well-known lack of respect for the rights of the accused. As for US officials not having sympathy for the victims, I'm not even going to dignify such a diatribe with a response.
In the vandalism incident, Liu does not even bother to say whether the child involved was American, let alone make a case for impudence being a human rights violation.
If Liu properly understood the concept of human rights, he'd be complaining about the presence of US troops in Okinawa and their lack of respect for local autonomy. He'd have pointed out that US troops committed atrocities in Vietnam because of systemic problems. He'd have words for the behavior of US textile companies in the Asia-Pacific region. He'd be arguing about the US waffling on the issue of Taiwan independence.
Instead, Liu appears to believe that an adolescent acting out is a major human rights violation, on par with My Lai, even.
Michael Turton
Leander, Texas
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed