The Taiwan Think Tank (
Think tanks in the US play an important role in the development of Washington's domestic and foreign policy, both up front and behind the scenes. The Brookings Institution, the American Enterprise Institute, the Heritage Foundation and the Center for Strategic and International Studies have also had decisive roles in Democratic and Republican policymaking. Many US think tanks boast top-notch researchers and their publications attract worldwide attention. These institutions also serve as a training ground for future government officials, as well as a place for former officials to cool their heels.
Governments are successful not because of their ability to maneuver political power, but because of their ability to integrate and mobilize private-sector resources and incorporate them into the overall policymaking process. In this regard, think tanks serve as an important bridge between the government and the private sector. However, think tanks in Taiwan are just beginning to move in this direction. What role they should play in the government's policymaking process, if any, is still the subject of much discussion.
Most of think tanks in Taiwan have links to the KMT or individual politicians. Some undertake government-commissioned research projects, while others publish periodicals and organize seminars. Some of them are highly academic. Very few could be described as truly influential.
Whether or not the Taiwan Think Tank will prove successful depends on several things:
First, it should narrow its focus to financial and economic issues, which are the weakest areas of the Chen government. After all, there are a myriad of topics that could be studied -- politics, economics, finances, defense, social welfare -- not to mention international and cross-straits relations. With its limited resources, the Taiwan Think Tank could not possibly study everything. By specializing, it could become a strong industry-academic-official policymaking platform in those areas. It could improve its chances of success by establishing communication channels with other private think tanks in order to effectively utilize Taiwan's limited resources.
Second, the Taiwan Think Tank should build close relations with government agencies. In particular, it should build an interactive model in the areas of information and intelligence exchange. This will prevent bookish, surreal research papers. It should serve as a catalyst for interaction between the private sector and officialdom and avoid becoming a rubber stamp for the bureaucracy.
Third, the Taiwan Think Tank should shape an alternative track for international relations and cross-strait interaction. Semi-official think tanks have considerable room for maneuver in terms of promoting cross-strait exchanges and dialogue through forums and regular symposiums.
As Taiwan's government continues to move from an authoritarian system to a democratic one, the mainstay forces of society are also gradually being released from government to the private sector. The rise of the private think tank represent the blossoming of civil society; they are a product of a wave of democracy. As the product of a marriage of politics and knowledge, it is to be hoped that think tanks will begin to play a much more productive role in Taiwan's economic and social development.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
RSS