The Taiwan Think Tank (
Think tanks in the US play an important role in the development of Washington's domestic and foreign policy, both up front and behind the scenes. The Brookings Institution, the American Enterprise Institute, the Heritage Foundation and the Center for Strategic and International Studies have also had decisive roles in Democratic and Republican policymaking. Many US think tanks boast top-notch researchers and their publications attract worldwide attention. These institutions also serve as a training ground for future government officials, as well as a place for former officials to cool their heels.
Governments are successful not because of their ability to maneuver political power, but because of their ability to integrate and mobilize private-sector resources and incorporate them into the overall policymaking process. In this regard, think tanks serve as an important bridge between the government and the private sector. However, think tanks in Taiwan are just beginning to move in this direction. What role they should play in the government's policymaking process, if any, is still the subject of much discussion.
Most of think tanks in Taiwan have links to the KMT or individual politicians. Some undertake government-commissioned research projects, while others publish periodicals and organize seminars. Some of them are highly academic. Very few could be described as truly influential.
Whether or not the Taiwan Think Tank will prove successful depends on several things:
First, it should narrow its focus to financial and economic issues, which are the weakest areas of the Chen government. After all, there are a myriad of topics that could be studied -- politics, economics, finances, defense, social welfare -- not to mention international and cross-straits relations. With its limited resources, the Taiwan Think Tank could not possibly study everything. By specializing, it could become a strong industry-academic-official policymaking platform in those areas. It could improve its chances of success by establishing communication channels with other private think tanks in order to effectively utilize Taiwan's limited resources.
Second, the Taiwan Think Tank should build close relations with government agencies. In particular, it should build an interactive model in the areas of information and intelligence exchange. This will prevent bookish, surreal research papers. It should serve as a catalyst for interaction between the private sector and officialdom and avoid becoming a rubber stamp for the bureaucracy.
Third, the Taiwan Think Tank should shape an alternative track for international relations and cross-strait interaction. Semi-official think tanks have considerable room for maneuver in terms of promoting cross-strait exchanges and dialogue through forums and regular symposiums.
As Taiwan's government continues to move from an authoritarian system to a democratic one, the mainstay forces of society are also gradually being released from government to the private sector. The rise of the private think tank represent the blossoming of civil society; they are a product of a wave of democracy. As the product of a marriage of politics and knowledge, it is to be hoped that think tanks will begin to play a much more productive role in Taiwan's economic and social development.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
To The Honorable Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜): We would like to extend our sincerest regards to you for representing Taiwan at the inauguration of US President Donald Trump on Monday. The Taiwanese-American community was delighted to see that Taiwan’s Legislative Yuan speaker not only received an invitation to attend the event, but successfully made the trip to the US. We sincerely hope that you took this rare opportunity to share Taiwan’s achievements in freedom, democracy and economic development with delegations from other countries. In recent years, Taiwan’s economic growth and world-leading technology industry have been a source of pride for Taiwanese-Americans.
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS