Recently an American technician was working on one of Taiwan's US-made Patriot surface-to-air missiles when a Taiwanese noncommissioned army officer walked up and asked an innocent question: "Would you stay if China attacked Taiwan and help us?"
The American said, "Sure, but you'd have to give me an M-16." And the Taiwanese replied, "Why? To defend yourself?"
"No," the American replied. "To shoot you with."
Frustration among American technicians over the way Taiwan runs its military is epidemic. The biggest complaint uttered by American technicians is Taiwan's noncommissioned officer (NCO) program. In the US army the program includes the ranks from sergeant to command sergeant major. In the navy the ranks are petty officer to master chief petty officer. NCOs are enlisted personnel with supervisory or technical responsibilities.
Basically, without its NCOs the US military would not function. They are long-serving professional soldiers who act as a buffer between the academic trained officer corps and the average green grunt. They take the impossible orders from above and translate them into doable responses. Without a reliable NCO program the military loses effective command and control during a crisis.
Americans are increasingly becoming Taiwan's de facto NCOs. They do not serve in Taiwan's military and are restricted to "technical service" of US-equipment sold to Taiwan. But they increasingly take on the role of maintenance and repair and little by little begin to give orders.
Taiwan's NCOs are not given the responsibility and authority that appropriately corresponds with their rank. They are not encouraged to take "the bull by the horns" when a problem arises. They cannot make everyday decisions about operations because of fear of backlash, should the decision be the wrong one or the one that the consensus would not have chosen.
When it comes to replacing a part, perhaps a light bulb on a control panel, the process becomes maddening. A sergeant major has to call a captain for permission, and then the captain calls Army headquarters to make sure a senior officer approves it. All of this to get parts that should be on hand for use, as these parts are expendable or within the range to keep in shop for repair. Since they are not on hand, they must be ordered from a warehouse that takes up to a month to deliver. The reason is the officers running the warehouse do not like the officers in the field.
In order to fix Taiwan's NCO program the military must realize that the NCOs can make better decisions because they work with the equipment everyday. They are not riding a desk at headquarters.
Taiwan needs to develop an NCO education system. Taiwan should not try to develop this program exactly like the US, because it will not work, but Taiwan can use the US example as a basis for designing a program that will work for Taiwan.
Many of Taiwan's NCOs are very professional soldiers, but their hands are tied because they are not allowed to make basic decisions and they have no authority. To make matters worse, promotions are not based on experience or job skills. After a certain amount of time at one rank, they are automatically promoted. The system actually encourages dysfunctional NCOs.
So what does Taiwan do when there is a war? Do US civilian technicians take over the role of NCO? Do they turn their M-16s on the Taiwan NCOs and joyfully pump a few rounds into them?
In a real war US technicians will more than likely jump ship, like rats from the Titanic. Taiwan's NCOs will probably hide in the closet pretending to search for the instruction manual, and officers at headquarters will be hiding under their desks kissing their behinds goodbye.
Wendell Minnick is Taiwan Correspondent for Jane's Defense Weekly.
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The National Development Council (NDC) on Wednesday last week launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported on Monday. The new visa is for foreign nationals from Taiwan’s list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts, but it is not clear how it differs from other visitor visas for nationals of those countries, CNA wrote. The NDC last year said that it hoped to attract 100,000 “digital nomads,” according to the report. Interest in working remotely from abroad has significantly increased in recent years following improvements in