This is but one of the many pieces of commentary I expect you'll be reading about the VCD that allegedly depicts a sexual encounter between a female public figure and her married lover.
Many of the opinions so far have been predictable: the video of two adults engaging in consensual sex violates their right to privacy; the media, though they have the right to publish freely what they feel is newsworthy, should exercise self-restraint; the sex life of the public official in question and the video itself hardly merit public scrutiny.
All are valid points.
But a deeper, more fundamental observation about the latest sex scandal to capture our attention can probably be made.
In short, the public's interest in the 40-minute video shot with a pinhole camera confirms what many in the media have long known. The public, on the whole, are a bunch of gawkers. They're voyeurs, easy titillated, and the media pander to them.
Scoop Weekly, (獨家報導) which distributed the VCD free with its latest edition, was sold out shortly after hitting the newsstands on Monday.
Before then, the video was burning up the hard drives of Web surfers around the nation as it made the rounds on the Internet -- that medium which is synonymous with sex.
There has been widespread interest in the video, but not because the public is concerned about the alleged promiscuous behavior of a public figure -- as Scoop Weekly would have you believe. Nor are they wringing their hands about invasions of privacy.
They're curious, because the purported star of this story is an attractive 36-year-old female politician, Chu Mei-feng (
A female friend who has seen the video commented: "I like his technique. He's really good." She was referring to the male in the video, who spends a good deal of time lavishing his partner with kisses.
Yes, issues of privacy and press freedom are important questions to consider -- but somehow I suspect the public is just plain infatuated. My friend's other comments were to note the attractiveness of the man in the video and his model-good looks.
This latest brouhaha about the media and sex brings to mind a famous affair that took place in the US.
Few people remember that America's most notorious scandal was about whether a US president had lied under oath, which gave the media their justification for reporting the private lives of Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky in breathless detail.
What they remember are the details: the president using his intern as a humidor, the evidence of a liaison left behind on her blue Gap dress, etc.
Again, the public are voyeurs, easy titillated.
But what's truly tragic about this most recent episode is the government's response.
Prosecutors say distribution of the video may violate Article 235 of the Criminal Code, which makes the distribution, sale or public display of indecent materials illegal. Simply put, government officials have labeled the video as "pornographic."
Should the government prevail in this line of thinking, I can't help but think that we would all be worse off.
This was a simple act of lovemaking -- common to any bedroom in Taiwan -- albeit one caught on camera. How can an act that condom-maker Durex says the average person in Taiwan engages in 65 times per year be called "pornographic?"
While Scoop Weekly may have taken a step backward with its pursuit of this non-story, the government risks doing the same for society with its equation that lovemaking is dirty.
Michael Logan is a Taipei-based journalist.
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In a Taipei Times editorial published almost three years ago (“Macron goes off-piste,” April 13, 2023, page 8), French President Emmanuel Macron was criticized for comments he made immediately after meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing. Macron had spoken of the need for his country to find a path on Chinese foreign policy no longer aligned with that of the US, saying that continuing to follow the US agenda would sacrifice the EU’s strategic autonomy. At the time, Macron was criticized for gifting Xi a PR coup, and the editorial said that he had been “persuaded to run
RSS