Gangsters have often been quoted as excusing their actions by saying that "in this world, we don't always have a choice." This is supposed to act as an apology for their inability to mend their evil ways or their belief that inadequacies in their upbringing or education left them no alternative but to turn to a life of crime.
It may also be the most appropriate way to explain why a Taiwanese company allowed the Chinese Communist Party to establish a political committee at a factory in Shenzhen. The difference between Taiwanese companies and gangsters, however, is that companies have no choice because they are dependent on the party's political power.
However, regardless of whether it is companies willing to accede to a political party's control or gangsters, each has freely chosen to place themselves in that situation and therefore have no one else to blame for their predicament.
Foxconn (
Having to live with political control is old hat for companies in Taiwan. The tentacles of the KMT's political organization reached into every official and private organization in Taiwan during its decades-long rule. So why all the fuss about the Chinese Communist Party establishing a political committee in a Taiwanese company in China? After all, establishing an organization for employees to pursue their political beliefs is natural in democratic nations and constitutionally guaranteed in many countries.
The problem is two-fold: China is a long way away from being a liberal democracy and there is also an imbalance in the cross-strait situation -- China is closed and authoritarian while Taiwan is pluralistic and open, putting Taiwan at a disadvantage.
The Chinese Communist Party establishing a party committee inside a Taiwanese-owned company makes us wonder what the owner will do if one day there is a labor dispute and the labor union intervenes, backed-up by the party? If the employer gives in -- even though he or she is in the right -- out of fear of political pressure, then there will be no end to the problems. Where will the owner draw the line if the party committee make endless demands? Will the company even have a future in China?
Even more absurd is what Kuo Tai-ming (
"New phase for our company" indeed -- Kuo and his colleagues either haven't considered the possible drawbacks of such a liaison or they are operating with blinders on. No matter what they may say now, they are effectively ceding control of their business. Chinese are fond of old maxims and there is one from the West that seems to apply here -- "Give them an inch and they will take a mile."
If the capitalists find themselves at odds one day with their workers' political committee, they shouldn't expect any sympathy from this side of the Taiwan Strait.
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
RSS