Can we really support the 13 pork-barrel bills tabled by the opposition parties, especially in Taiwan's difficult financial situation today? The answer should be obvious. The question now is how dare the opposition lawmakers be so irresponsible as to turn a blind eye to the nation's collective interests and try to use taxpayers' money to curry the favor of small interest groups? How could they fail to consider the public's inevitable angry reaction? What has gone so wrong with Taiwan's democracy that the legislature has spawned such bizarre proposals time and again?
In fact, the recent fracas over the NT$4 trillion-plus proposals was a repeat from the previous legislative session. The greedy lawmakers did not have their way then, and so now they are launching a second offensive, yet again bent on bribing their respective constituencies with political "red envelopes."
The sole purpose of their proposals is to win the necessary votes in the December elections for their parties to increase their number of legislative seats. Placing self-interest above national interests and the people's welfare is an act that deserves condemnation as well as substantive boycotts. At the very least, the names of the lawmakers who tabled the bills should be made public in the news media again and again, especially in their constituencies, so that voters will know who not to choose.
According to a recent report from the Ministry of Finance, Taiwan's actual tax revenues totaled NT$78 billion in September, a fall of NT$20.7 billion from the same period last year. Tax revenues from January to September totaled NT$1.024 trillion, down by NT$87.6 billion from the same period last year. The figures should be a cause of concern for anyone who cares about national affairs.
Meanwhile, the central government's debt has already risen to NT$2.9 trillion, most of which is left over from the KMT era. The government's difficult financial situation after typhoons Toraji and Nari is also well known. Combine this with the specter of a global recession and there should be a consensus among all Taiwanese that the government should be asked to cut spending. Lawmakers, being representatives of the people, should also be watching the government's purse strings, but what they are doing is exactly the opposite. How can the lawmakers ask the government to open its coffers for freebies in such difficult times?
If the opposition parties, which have majority control of the Legislative Yuan, continue to use their superior numbers to pressure the minority DPP government -- totally ignoring the rights and wrongs of the bills or the consequences of such legislation -- then Taiwan's legislature is digging a grave for its own people.
Perhaps their agenda is to dig a grave for Taiwan and to consign the country to history. In the past, South Korea and the Philippines were economic powerhouses in Asia. Now they have long been surpassed by Taiwan -- mostly because their governments went broke, leading to the collapse of their economies. Many years later, these countries are still struggling for economic recovery.
These lessons are only a few years old. How can Taiwan's lawmakers be so forgetful? If those greedy opposition lawmakers carry on with their ways and are not punished by voters, Taiwan's status and its standard of living may quickly fall. Is this what everyone really wants?
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
RSS