With an aim of sharing national security affairs and acquiring advice from his counterparts, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) invited leaders of Taiwan's opposition parties to attend a National Security Council briefing after the launch of US attacks on Afghanistan last week. However, his efforts to generate domestic consensus on crisis management were spoiled by a boycott of the meeting by leaders of the opposition.
Although he expressed regret that the opposition leaders were absent from the briefing, Chen pledged that the meeting would serve as a first step to the establishment of an institution where the government would invite leaders from across party lines to discuss issues of vital national interest.
The opposition leaders' narrow-minded boycott demonstrates the lack of trust in Taiwan's political circles even when it comes to matters of national security, which is a sad reality in Taiwan's political culture. It also explains why Chen made an appeal on National Day for the nourishing of a civil society.
Democratic maturity is only achieved on the foundation of rational debate and mutual respect. Since the historic first-ever transition of political power last May, our political system has experienced a tough time in terms of party cooperation. Both the ruling and the opposition parties failed to engage in healthy democratic competition; instead they had absolutely no respect or trust for each other.
Taiwan's experiences over the past year illustrate that Taiwan's political stability has a direct bearing on its economic development and public confidence. Only a civil society that pursues political reconciliation and cooperation between the governing and opposition parties can develop and produce the optimum benefits for its people.
The US' handling of the Sept. 11 disaster is a case in point. After the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, the US government and citizens at all levels have united in their fight against a common enemy. They have encouraged each other and extended unanimous support to the government in its handling of the crisis. This is a true civil society that has been shaped by 200 years of democracy.
This trust in each other has been clear not only in the flourishing of American flags and the making of public speeches, but in the desire of Americans to help each other, and in their grief for people most of them have never met. In the face of such a disaster, New York has revealed itself as a city filled with human beings.
In Taiwan, such human dignity was also shown after Typhoons Toraji and Nari. People worked hand in hand in rebuilding their families even without the government's assistance. In moments of crisis, a person's true nature tends to show through. The same holds for societies.
Still, what separates the people of the US from other nations stricken by atrocities, such as China and Russia, or from rogue states that despise democratic countries, is that Americans trust their countrymen. They trust each other.
There was neither protest against the government's post-attacks action, nor was there any fingerpointing at the US intelligence community. What we have seen is consistent support for the government's strikes against the terrorists.
The international community's anti-terrorism campaign, led primarily by the US, will definitely have a significant impact on Taiwan's security and economy. The Chen administration has publicly supported all necessary US actions to fight terrorism and expressed its willingness to be part of the global effort against terrorism.
In terms of helping the government prepare contingency measures in anticipation of possible changes in the international situation, the opposition should play a more constructive role instead of pulling the administration's legs out from under it.
This is a moment when all Taiwanese should be calm, united, and understand the importance of the notion of "being vigilant in peace time." Moreover, it is also a time for us to develop a sense of community that holds us together.
In times of trouble, free markets and democracy make loving each other alot easier. While Taiwan does enjoy significant economic and political achievements, we still have a long way to go in terms of making trust the highest value in our hard won democracy.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which