Events of the past weeks bring home with painful clarity that the process of globalization inspires great disagreement concerning its nature and impact. Despite the horrific acts of terrorism, one point of agreement is that this process is seemingly irresistible. Engaging this debate requires identifying some essential elements of this momentum. One place to start is to discard an important misinterpretation.
Globalization should not be confused with Westernization or Americanization of economies and cultures. This plays into the hands of those who wish to create diviseness between peoples.
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
Some of those who would believe this might be forgiven in having observed that there has been a convergence towards certain norms or rules that are associated with Western cultures, especially concerning commercial considerations.
Promoting this misconception implicitly assigns a sense of domination or superiority of Western or US culture over others, itself a patently foolish assertion. The view offered here is that this convergence is a natural and evolutionary procedure. In this sense, global convergence arises from voluntary choices by citizens and their governments to engage in worldwide markets to achieve some individual and collective goals, including shared prosperity. Indeed, the overpowering nature that some observers find so troubling is actually the outcome of choices made by most other members of their own communities.
In the end, the movement is towards the establishment of and guidance by the legal bounds that govern contracts. As will be argued, exposure to contracts has important impacts on cultures since it imposes greater accountability on businesses as well as governments.
As such, globalization should not be viewed as the outcome of anonymous, outside and mysterious forces. Instead, an important source of globalizing influences in a local economy arises from choices made by most of ones compatriots who prefer better or cheaper products that are imports rather than shoddy or higher priced ones produced locally.
In this narrow interpretation, globalization can be seen as a universal application of democracy. Opposition to these results is tantamount to an elitist loathing of thy neighbor, or at least their choices. In all events, the spreading of the benefits of globalization depends upon how well markets function, because competitive markets are a force that empowers consumers and humbles producers. And well-functioning markets require and inspire a certain attitude towards agreements that can be identified as a "contract culture."
A contract culture exists when all parties in an agreement are predictably treated as equals whenever there is a legal dispute or a need for interpretation of the conditions behind the pact. Markets both depend upon and set the stage for the emergence of a contract culture as well as providing an impetus for the emergence of a commercial morality and a wider application of trust. In turn, institutional frameworks evolve to reinforce and reward or punish actions in reference to the agreements and the legal institutions that support them. This convergence is inspired by globalization.
While most may think that the discussion only involves private contracts concerning commercial transactions, it also covers social contracts like constitutions that specify duties and obligations of citizens and rulers.
Markets inspire the development of a contract culture where the spirit of compromise becomes part of human interaction.
In such a setting, equals are treated as equals just as unequals must also be treated as equals before the law.
Governments or large corporations should not receive special treatment in the courts over individual citizens while domestic interests should not override those of foreign claimants. At the same time, interactions within a community where contracts are widely negotiated can bring about a greater appreciation for compromise and humility that might undermine future claims for authoritarian leadership.
Viewed from this vantage point, capitalism and free markets are seen to provide a necessary underpinning for democracy's success rather than merely a sufficient one. It is through individualist-based institutions associated with and arising from markets that people exercise true self-ownership to pursue their own chosen goals.
The importance of establishing a contract culture cuts deep. It is an intangible element in the measurement of growth factors, but it is certainly an essential element of the institutional framework for an active player in the global economy. Apart from promoting political stability due to greater fairness, the contract culture is also associated with "middle class values" such as the importance of education, thrift and moral values that promote hard work and honesty in contract fulfilment. Globalization can reduce some of the economic vagaries by eliminating some of the sources of recurrent crises. During periods of rapid economic growth, massive cash flows can compensate for some of the inconveniences arising from a weak adherence to contractual obligations.
Once an economy reaches a certain level of maturity or begins to lose its comparative advantages, the importance of legal protections becomes clearer. It is the absence of such safety measures that induce investors to undertake reassessments that can lead to the sort of mass exoduses of capital such as the one associated with the trumoil that swept much of Asia in and after 1997.
In many Asian countries, the dominance of autocratic rule led to an entrenchment of hierarchical power relations that retard the development of a local contract culture. Outside of some former British colonies, few Asian countries have an independent and competent judiciary that issue rulings based upon strict interpretations of a body of law concerning fulfillment of contracts that includes predictable bankruptcy proceedings. Yet the exposure to and pressures from the international marketplace will eventually pressure governments to adhere to the rule of law.
Some opponents to globalization express legitimate concerns. Perhaps the most compelling objection is the fear of the dilution of local culture. Nonetheless, opening a community to global influences is most likely to reveal the strengths of those elements that are worth keeping and undercover weak points that might be given up. (It is worth noting that the Dutch have been deeply engaged in the globalization process for centuries without losing their unique cultural identity).
An assessment of globalization should begin with the fact that it introduces a contract culture in association with the rule of law to support a modern market-based economy. Although there will always be transition costs of such monumental changes, there are reasons to believe these will be exceeded by the benefits. Above all other benefits is the increased commercial and political accountability that offers greater protections to citizens and consumers.
Christopher Lingle is global strategist for eConoLytics.com and author of The Rise and Decline of the Asian Century.
There are moments in history when America has turned its back on its principles and withdrawn from past commitments in service of higher goals. For example, US-Soviet Cold War competition compelled America to make a range of deals with unsavory and undemocratic figures across Latin America and Africa in service of geostrategic aims. The United States overlooked mass atrocities against the Bengali population in modern-day Bangladesh in the early 1970s in service of its tilt toward Pakistan, a relationship the Nixon administration deemed critical to its larger aims in developing relations with China. Then, of course, America switched diplomatic recognition
The international women’s soccer match between Taiwan and New Zealand at the Kaohsiung Nanzih Football Stadium, scheduled for Tuesday last week, was canceled at the last minute amid safety concerns over poor field conditions raised by the visiting team. The Football Ferns, as New Zealand’s women’s soccer team are known, had arrived in Taiwan one week earlier to prepare and soon raised their concerns. Efforts were made to improve the field, but the replacement patches of grass could not grow fast enough. The Football Ferns canceled the closed-door training match and then days later, the main event against Team Taiwan. The safety
The National Immigration Agency on Tuesday said it had notified some naturalized citizens from China that they still had to renounce their People’s Republic of China (PRC) citizenship. They must provide proof that they have canceled their household registration in China within three months of the receipt of the notice. If they do not, the agency said it would cancel their household registration in Taiwan. Chinese are required to give up their PRC citizenship and household registration to become Republic of China (ROC) nationals, Mainland Affairs Council Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said. He was referring to Article 9-1 of the Act
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
RSS