The Taipei District Prosecutors' Office (
Lo reportedly found the news hard to swallow. The prosecutors' decision may have really taken him by surprise. Wishfully thinking that he is invincible and can have his own way under Taiwan's protective umbrella for legislators, the conceited Lo never imagined that prosecutors would use the Anti-Hoodlum Law to deal with him. Does that mean Lo's good old days are coming to an end?
Lo and his lawmaker son are eager to use legislative immunity to strike back. Lo's son, Lo Ming-tsai (
Legislative Yuan speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
What matters is that Interpretation No. 435 by the Council of Grand Justices said that legislative immunity does not protect lawmakers' actions. The interpretation stressed that the judiciary may exercise its investigative powers when necessary in order to maintain social order and protect victims' rights. Therefore, it is constitutional for prosecutors to exercise their investigative powers on lawmakers. But the two Lo's may find it difficult to get their petition across the legal threshold (endorsement from one-third of the legislature). Even if they can, the Grand Justices may not accept their petition.
The elder Lo's wild behavior in the legislature and his lack of respect for the law should not be tolerated either in a lawmaking body or in Taiwan's society in general. Lawmakers and the public may be rejoicing the prosecutors' decision to designate Lo as a gangster. So far only 20-plus legislators have dared to risk nationwide condemnation by endorsing the younger Lo's signature drive.
Despite signing up for the drive, KMT caucus leader Lee Cheng-chong (
So, who and which political parties are protecting Lo Fu-chu in the legislature? Who are willing to extend "private help" to Lo? This signature drive may serve not only as evidence but also as the voter's best reference in the December legislative elections.
Chin Heng-wei is editor in chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Jackie Lin
There are moments in history when America has turned its back on its principles and withdrawn from past commitments in service of higher goals. For example, US-Soviet Cold War competition compelled America to make a range of deals with unsavory and undemocratic figures across Latin America and Africa in service of geostrategic aims. The United States overlooked mass atrocities against the Bengali population in modern-day Bangladesh in the early 1970s in service of its tilt toward Pakistan, a relationship the Nixon administration deemed critical to its larger aims in developing relations with China. Then, of course, America switched diplomatic recognition
The international women’s soccer match between Taiwan and New Zealand at the Kaohsiung Nanzih Football Stadium, scheduled for Tuesday last week, was canceled at the last minute amid safety concerns over poor field conditions raised by the visiting team. The Football Ferns, as New Zealand’s women’s soccer team are known, had arrived in Taiwan one week earlier to prepare and soon raised their concerns. Efforts were made to improve the field, but the replacement patches of grass could not grow fast enough. The Football Ferns canceled the closed-door training match and then days later, the main event against Team Taiwan. The safety
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama