Since the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington earlier this month, the response from Taiwan has mostly consisted of vigorous tongue-lashing against the US and its lenient treatment of terrorists. From a humanitarian point of view, such an attitude is problematic.
Certainly, the US has provoked much hatred in the past in its self-proclaimed role as the world's policeman. But would the world fare any better without the US?
South Korea and Taiwan would not only have been lost to Communist rule, but also ground to utter poverty by various other horrific movements. Even Western Europe could have fallen long ago. The collapse of Communist regimes in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union would not have occurred. China, moreover, would have had to forget about today's reforms and affluence -- it could have come under Soviet nuclear attack in the 1960s.
The US has certainly been biased in Israel's favor in its Middle Eastern policy, but it has not fired a single shot in that conflict, which is the result of a bloody war between Israel and its neighbors. The US attacks on Iraq were provoked by Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. The allied troops did not invade Iraqi
territory.
The idea of a conflict between Arab-Islamic and Western-Christian civilizations is therefore a delusion. In fact, most Islamic leaders are condemning the savage attacks on civilians.
Why, then, are some among Taiwan's media ignoring these facts and condemning the US? The main reason has been a misinterpretation of Beijing's anti-Americanism, and the belief that any misfortune that befalls the US is good.
Setting aside the massive damage done to China's economy by that misfortune, we should note that the Beijing government immediately sided with the US and condemned the terrorists. Beijing has even suppressed its own domestic anti-American rhetoric. Why? Because China itself has suffered from more than 100 bombings a year committed by Xinjiang separatists.
Have the pro-Beijing, anti-American people in Taiwan who applaud the terrorist attacks thought about these at all?
Since the incidents, various US government officials have repeatedly called on the public not to bear any hostility toward Muslims and Arabs, but to treat them fairly. US president George W. Bush visited some mosques, Congress introduced legislation to protect Muslims and Arabs and a judge in Georgia postponed a final ruling against a Muslim defendant, describing the current atmosphere as not conducive to a fair verdict.
These actions all illustrate that the US has not lost its rationality. this is in stark contrast to the barbaric behavior of terrorists who treat civilians like dogs -- behavior that indicates their level of "humanity."
The terrorists behind the attacks on New York and Washington represent neither Islamic civilization nor Arab people. The teachings of Islam are of peace and compassion. That is why most Muslims in the world have opposed both the terrorists and the Taliban regime of Afghanistan, which oppresses women and destroyed the giant Buddha statues of Bamiyan.
The war between the US and the terrorists is therefore clearly not a conflict between civilizations. There is much in US foreign policy, especially toward the Middle East, that needs to be reviewed. But it should not be put on par with the brutal butchering of civilians. Otherwise, how can one answer to one's own rationality and conscience? The nature of this tragedy should be made absolutely clear. As British Prime Minister Tony Blair said, this was not an attack on the US, it was an attack on civilization.
Pu Ta-chung is a political commentator in Taipei.
Translated by Francis Huang
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
RSS