Doctors not all bad
I do not want to create a feud between doctors and lawyers, but I think that a sweeping statement that suggests Taiwanese doctors' "prime motive is greed" is unfair (Brian Kennedy, "An Rx for Taiwan's medical profession," Aug. 21, page 8).
I am a psychiatrist from the University of the Philippines, who gave up a flourishing practice to be with my husband, also a doctor, and raise our family in Taiwan. My husband is very compassionate, tries to take the time to explain everything to patients and relatives and gets rather depressed when the patient is not improving despite his best efforts. He doesn't even look at his paycheck, leaving financial matters to me.
My husband came to Taiwan from the Philippines so that he could practice medicine, as his father wanted him to take care of the family business. My father-in-law felt that there was no money in medicine and that business was more lucrative. It is true that some doctors might be in it for the money and the prestige, but I also see a lot of doctors, such as my husband and his colleagues, who care very deeply for their patients.
For those who have not undergone the training, studying and sleepless nights doctors endure, it might look as though doctors have it all.
But we also have to go through a lot before we earn our medical degrees.
It is true that former president Lee Teng-hui (
I would suggest that medical schools should put more emphasis on bedside manner and empathy for patients. Clinical work should emphasize this, and it's best to begin early when students are just starting medical school.
Such training should be handled by a competent and compassionate practitioner (someone who is not busy with patients). Maybe we could get retired doctors, or non-practicing ones, who know medicine to teach students that there is more to medicine than just getting the correct diagnosis and giving the right treatment.
Rosario Lim, MD
Taipei
Go after `tobacco's fat cats'
H.L. Mencken once said: "To every complex problem, there's a simple solution and it's always wrong." Blaming all the evils of Taiwan's health care system on our doctors is simply a step in the wrong direction.
Despite former president Lee's decision to travel to Japan for his operation, many of my patients who are senior citizens, including my own grandfather, believe that comprehensive health insurance is the best thing the government has done for its people.
In contrast, one out of every seven people in the US does not have health insurance.
In the US, frivolous lawsuits require doctors to perform thousands of additional tests and procedures in order to "protect" themselves from lawyers, driving up the price of health care. As a result, many people cannot afford health insurance, and those without insurance have to wait for hours and sometimes days to be seen at a county hospital.
Nevertheless, I still believe that lawyers still have a place in our health care crisis. For example, smoking is the most preventable cause of death in the US and Taiwan. Lung cancer has replaced breast cancer as the leading cause of cancer death among American women in recent years, and a recent study found that one out of every three Chinese men will die from a smoking-related death.
In the US, a flurry of anti-smoking campaigns has removed cigarette ads from magazines, newspapers and billboards. The campaign is partially driven by many of the billion-dollar lawsuits pending against tobacco companies, including Philip Morris, the maker of Marlboro cigarettes.
Philip Morris, however, has simply moved its operations overseas, including its recent construction of a US$300 million cigarette factory in the Philippines. It has been accused of targeting its Marlboro products toward Asian women. Meanwhile, the US government looks the other way.
Reducing smoking-related deaths in Taiwan would translate into the biggest cost reduction in our health care system. Perhaps Taiwanese lawyers, along with their enthusiastic American counterparts like Brian Kennedy, can help us go after big tobacco's fat cats and save some Taiwanese lives.
Kenny Liu, MD
Hualien
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big