Recent decisive actions taken by the government bodies responsible for financial policymaking -- including stationing representatives in 36 grassroots financial institutions in order to jump-start reform mechanisms -- are worthy of endorsement. Nevertheless, a number of structural problems remain.
First of all, it is doubtful that the NT$140 billion available for implementing the "three financial reconstruction statutes" is sufficient to counteract all the bad debt accumulated by grass-roots institutions (at least NT$210 billion). In the future, if the cleanup expands to include not only grassroots institutions but also others such as ordinary commercial banks, then the size of the fund will obviously be insufficient.
A wave of drastic corrective measures is still in the ascendant. To be sure, earlier revisions to the deposit insurance laws guarantee the rights and interests of depositors. But if we avoid all negative repercussions, then the effectiveness of reforms will be greatly reduced.
For example, the Ministry of Finance's move to require the Taiwan Cooperative Bank (合庫) to absorb the Changhua Fourth Credit Cooperative (彰化四信) -- a decision which was overruled by the Council of Grand Justices -- illustrates why the next step in cleaning up financial institutions should be watched carefully.
The legal basis for mergers has already been provided for by the Financial Institutions Merger Law (
Since privately managed banks must be responsible to their shareholders and face pressure from international credit-rating agencies and other institutions, they should be able to refuse a disadvantageous merger.
But what about the state-owned banks? The finance ministry announced at the beginning of this year, "If bank directors are stubbornly uncooperative, there will be no option but to replace them. The Ministry of Finance will not hesitate to do this."
When faced with losing their positions, how can the directors of state-owned banks refuse instructions from above to "fulfill the social obligations of financial institutions?"
Mergers shouldn't be used as a policy tool and they certainly are not a good method for solving the problems of overdue loans and bad debt. These problems must be solved by changing the underlying system. Otherwise, we are merely passing problems off on others and delaying their onset.
The first order of business should be to strengthen the overall capital resources of financial institutions, requiring them to maintain a capital ratio equal to the international standard of at least 8 percent. Otherwise, the government should require them to increase their capital, restrict their services or change their senior management.
Second, after the next session begins at the Legislative Yuan, the legal framework for a financial supervisory system should also be quickly set up in order to nip problems in the bud.
Introducing asset management companies and resolution trust corporations from abroad is only one possible mechanism. We shouldn't expect that they will be able to completely solve the problem. In particular, demanding that healthy banks merge with unhealthy ones will only bring down the overall quality of the post-merger banks. It is essential to proceed with caution.
Hong Chi-chang is a DPP legislator.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
Two major Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-People’s Liberation Army (PLA) power demonstrations in November 2024 highlight the urgency for Taiwan to pursue a military buildup and deterrence agenda that can take back control of its destiny. First, the CCP-PLA’s planned future for Taiwan of war, bloody suppression, and use as a base for regional aggression was foreshadowed by the 9th and largest PLA-Russia Joint Bomber Exercise of Nov. 29 and 30. It was double that of previous bomber exercises, with both days featuring combined combat strike groups of PLA Air Force and Russian bombers escorted by PLAAF and Russian fighters, airborne early warning
For three years and three months, Taiwan’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) has remained stalled. On Nov. 29, members meeting in Vancouver agreed to establish a working group for Costa Rica’s entry — the fifth applicant in line — but not for Taiwan. As Taiwan’s prospects for CPTPP membership fade due to “politically sensitive issues,” what strategy should it adopt to overcome this politically motivated economic exclusion? The situation is not entirely dim; these challenges offer an opportunity to reimagine the export-driven country’s international trade strategy. Following the US’ withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
On Tuesday, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) issued a statement criticizing Song Siyao (宋思瑤), a student from Shanghai’s Fudan University, saying she had offended the sensibilities of Taiwanese. It also called for the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation — established by former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) — which had organized the tour group, to remind group members to be careful with their statements. Song, during a visit to a baseball stadium in Taichung, said that the tour group “would like to congratulate China, Taipei team (中國台北隊) ... we wish mainland China and Taiwan compatriots can be like the team Chinatrust Brothers and
“Integrated Diplomacy” (總和外交) is the guiding principle of Taiwan’s current foreign policy. It seeks to mobilize technology, capital and talent for global outreach, strengthening Taiwan’s international connections. However, without a robust information security mechanism, such efforts risk being reduced to superficial courtesy calls. Security clearance serves as the “entrance examination results” for government agency personnel in sensitive positions, qualifying them to access sensitive information. Senior aides in the US Congress must also possess security clearance to assist lawmakers in handling classified budgets. However, security clearance is not an automatic right or a blanket necessity for accessing sensitive information. Access is granted only
RSS